Richmond’s Early Chinese Canadian Settlers, No.2: LAM Tuck Yew, LEUNG Yuet Wah and The Hong Wo & Company Store – A Family Connection

Clarence Sihoe 22 October 2026  

Genealogical research often takes you to unexpected places. The twists and turns on the road to discovery are numerous and family historians know this well. So I experienced during my search for LAM Ching Ling, CHEW Gore and their family. They are, of course, synonymous in Richmond’s written record with Hong Wo & Company General Merchants and were the subjects of the first story in this series about the early Chinese Canadian settlers of Richmond. https://richmondarchives.ca/2025/11/06/richmonds-early-chinese-canadian-settlers-lam-ching-ling-and-chew-gore/

LAM family collection and City of Richmond Archives #2026 5

My close look into their lives began in mid-2024, and uncovered facts previously unknown or forgotten. We now have the dates of their first arrival in Canada, the ships on which they sailed, the addresses of the homes in which they lived, the names and birthdates of the children–all details that add to our knowledge of their history.

Certain discoveries I made along the way however confused the picture. First, while reviewing LAM Ching Ling’s biographical file that is held within the City of Richmond Archives, I came across the 2013 obituary of Samuel Milton LAM. The statement that he was born in Steveston part of the Hong Wo Lam Family made me pause. I knew of Mary, George, Jessie and Dora, and later learned of Fannie and John, all children of LAM Ching Ling and CHEW Gore, but Samuel wasn’t, as far as I could tell, part of this family group. What was going on here?

More puzzle pieces appeared. In recent years, thousands of records related to Chinese immigration to Canada were released by Library and Archives Canada and made available to the public. Chinese Canadian historians – family and professionals alike – rejoiced, despite the dark origins of these records. 

For example, under section 18 of the Chinese Immigration Act, 1923, the Canadian government created and maintained a list of Chinese who registered as native born. The LAM Ching Ling children, all born in Steveston, B.C., were included in this list, and for each a Chinese Immigration C.I. 44 certificate was created indicating their status. Also registered was Miss Constance LAMB, born on 12 November 1904, in Steveston, B. C., and on her certificate her parents were identified as LIM Saw and LAUNG Shee. 

1923 Chinese Exclusion Act – Exhibition and Archive https://1923-chinese-exclusion.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/CANADIAN-BORN-registered.pdf

Was Miss Constance LAMB actually Constance LAM?  The LIM and LAM surnames share the same Chinese character.  Interesting. Here we had children who were born in the same town, around the same time early in the twentieth century, and were similar in name. I wondered, was there a connection to be made here? 

Chinese Immigration C.I.9 travel documents were also the source of valuable information.  Any Chinese person travelling outside of Canada, who had an intention to return, were required to apply for these papers. In September 1923, Constance (Connie) prepared for a trip to Hong Kong and on her document was the notation she was

personally known to LAM Ling of Steveston to whom I would refer you for correctness of statements herein made.

I thought, was this the LAM Ching Ling, proprietor of the Hong Wo & Co. store?

Other records revealed that Connie had an older sister, Nellie Lim. Nellie’s C.I.9 certificate from 1932 stated that she was born in Canada and her current place of residence was Steveston, care of the Hong Wo Store! The evidence was mounting. I was now confident in thinking that a link of some kind existed between these two families.

C.I.9 travel document issued to Nellie Lim, Library and Archives Canada https://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.redirect?app=immfrochi&id=106652&lang=eng&ecopy=e008282568

A search into the records of Constance and Nellie’s father, LIM Saw, revealed more clues. I learned that he entered Canada in 1894 under the name LUM Won Saw and that he was known most often in later life as LAM Tuck Yew. Admitted as a labourer, he eventually gained merchant status while operating a general store, but which one? How many general stores were Chinese operated in Richmond during the 1920s? The Hong Wo & Co. store was the best known and had reportedly been in existence since 1895.

C.I.9 travel document issued to LAM Tuck Yew in 1927. Canadian Research Knowledge Network https://heritage.canadiana.ca/view/oocihm.lac_reel_t16600/2430

The General Register of Chinese Immigration indicated that LIM Saw brought his wife LAUNG Shee over from China in July 1912. From a variety of documents I examined, I concluded that together they had at least ten children, including their eldest son, Samuel Milton, born in 1919 at

Lulu Island (No.3 Road, near London, B.C.)

the man whose obituary I found in LAM Ching Ling’s biographical file!  

LAM Ching Ling died in 1939 and in his death notice it was mentioned that among his survivors there was a brother living in Steveston. The brother’s name however was not given.  LIM Saw died in 1943. His obituary appeared in the newspapers of the day in September 1943, and he is identified as Tuck Yew LAM,

the proprietor of Hong Wo and Co., Steveston.

Vancouver Daily Province, Tuesday, October 5, 1943 page 5.

Finally, all the bits and pieces had come together. These two men were brothers, and LIM Saw had succeeded LAM Ching Ling in the running of a business. The success of the Hong Wo & Co. general merchant store and farming operation stemmed from the hard work of two families rather than just one!

All this investigative work had taken over a year to complete. I understood the basic connection between the LAM Ching Ling and LAM Tuck Yew families but of course many details were still unknown. I continued my search and in March 2025 and again in August I posted comments about my research in the Facebook page of the Genealogy for Asian Canadians group.https://www.facebook.com/groups/1923544271050858 I was puzzled about apparent disconnects in names within the LAM Ching Ling family and needed help in translation, and various members made comments and suggestions. The responses were much appreciated. What I hadn’t noticed until a few months later was a reply that read in part:

My Grandfather was the brother of Lam Ching Ling.  He also helped run the Hong Wo store and farm in Steveston.  His name was LAM Tuck Yew.

Good fortune had arrived! A LAM Tuck Yew family member had reached out and could help put the pieces of the Hong Wo & Co. store story I had collected, into their proper place.

So, since November 2025 I have met with Maisie LAM several times to hear her talk about her side of the “Hong Wo family.” Maisie is the daughter of Samuel Milton, granddaughter of LIM Saw, and grandniece of LAM Ching Ling. She expressed surprise that so much material about the LAM Ching Ling family was stored at the City of Richmond Archives and that people were interested in learning about the life and contributions of the LIM Saw family line. Some of the details were even new to her. Thanks to Maisie and her extended family, our knowledge of her grandparents LAM Tuck Yew and LEUNG Yuet Wah, and of their important contribution to the Hong Wo & Co. business, is more complete than ever.

Photograph believed to be of LAM Tuck Yew, taken circa 1905 by R.H. Trueman in Steveston. Steves Family Collection, City of Richmond Archives photograph #2024 9 29

Details about LAM Tuck Yew’s early life in British Columbia, however, are scarce. Seven years after his landing in Victoria, he is recorded as living with LAM Ching Ling and family in the 1901 Census of Canada.

The 1901 Census of Canada, Library and Archives Canada https://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.redirect?app=census&id=33558619&lang=eng&ecopy=z000011324

LAM Ching Ling, his wife and their two elder daughters are listed on the first four lines of this excerpt from the census record, while LAM Tuck Yew, recorded as LIM Saw, at the bottom, is described as a lodger rather than a brother. They’re residing in some household in Richmond, B.C., possibly within quarters situated along the Steveston waterfront, amongst many other Chinese people. It may have been the living space above the Hong Wo store – Maisie believes the building was built by LAM Tuck Yew himself, having the skills of a carpenter – and the two brothers may have already been in partnership in the operation of their retail and farming business.

LAM Tuck Yew travelled back to China in 1911 or thereabouts, and returned in the summer of 1912 with his wife, LEUNG Yuet Wah, and according to the General Register of Chinese Immigration records, they were accompanied by a son, Gong Yim, eleven; and two daughters, nine-year-old Nellie and five-year-old Connie. Neither wife nor children were required to pay the $500 head tax as they were family of a Chinese man who had merchant status.

LEUNG Yuet Wah, LAM family collection and City of Richmond Archives photograph #2026 39 2

Gong Yim is absent from the LAM family history records, and Maisie is unsure if he was a son of LAM Tuck Yew and LEUNG Yuet Wah. Perhaps he was LAM Tuck Yew’s nephew or younger brother, or just another member of the LAM clan, and he may simply have gone his own way once he landed, losing contact with the family as the years passed. Gong Yim worked as a clerk, travelled back to China in 1921, and was last known to be living in Steveston in 1924, working as a farmer.

Gong Yim registered with the federal authorities as required by Section 18 of the Chinese Immigration Act of 1923. Library and Archives Canada https://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.redirect?app=immfrochi&id=212719&lang=eng&ecopy=t-16167-03065

Nellie and Connie were recorded in the General Register of Chinese Immigration as Yong Luig and Hung Jiu. Most people registered in these ledgers were arriving as new immigrants, yet both Nellie and Connie later claimed to have been born in Canada. This was important as Chinese who were native born were permitted to freely travel outside of Canada without any time restrictions. Immigrants from China who settled in Canada could not and risked being denied re-entry if they stayed outside the country beyond the two-year time limit. Extensions to four years were sometimes permitted in times of war.

Life started anew for the family in Steveston, a place that certainly must have felt very alien from their home of Sun Chan village, Sun Woy (Xinhui) county, Kwangtung (Guangdong) province in southern China. The family expanded quickly nevertheless, with the births of May 1912, Rose 1913, Edith 1915, and Alice 1917, followed by Samuel Milton in 1919, taking place in the living quarters above the family store.

LEUNG Yuet Wah and children, circa 1917. LAM family collection

Business of the Hong Wo & Co. store and the Richmond Gardens operation also appeared to be prospering. Growing and selling cucumbers to the companies who used them to make dill pickles was well under way.

Order Book, Hong Wo & Co. Richmond Gardens 1919, City of Richmond Archives accession #2019 60 11

The business shares were divided along a five-ninths to four-ninths line, with the larger portion going to elder brother LAM Ching Ling, who reportedly established the business circa 1895. While LIM Saw may have been the junior partner in the operation, he was more than just a farmer and general store merchant. He practiced Chinese medicine and signs displayed within the store premises advertised the services and products he offered.

LAM family collection

This glass sign announced that LAM Tuck Yew (first three characters, second column from right), was an “expert physician – external medicine/surgery – who trained under a Mr. LI Chung, covering everything from skin diseases and venereal diseases to bone-setting and pediatric ailments.   

The metal sign is a companion signboard listing specific medicines and products sold at the clinic: pills, plasters, and powders for pain relief, itchiness, cuts and abscesses. Harold Steves has collected various artefacts from the Hong Wo & Co. store, including bottles, jars, and small tins. Many have labels on which are written Chinese characters, (awaiting translation!). Perhaps some of them held the medicines used by LAM Tuck Yew?

LAM family collection and City of Richmond Archives accession #2026 5

As for any concern about adapting to life in Canada, Nellie appeared to have had little difficulty. She reportedly completed her high school education locally, but whether it was in Richmond or Vancouver has not yet been confirmed.

LAM family collection

Although work at the store and on the farm was probably life’s major focus, LAM Tuck Yew and LEUNG Yuet Wah came to know other members of the Chinese community living in the region, including other LAM families working in the farming industry. An important connection was made with THOM Tong Chue, also known as T.C. Thom, a missionary working in New Westminster, and one of the earliest Chinese Methodist ministers serving Chinese Canadians in British Columbia. He assisted the family in reporting Connie’s birth to the District Registrar of Births, Deaths, and Marriages. A friendship also developed with WONG Kung Lai, who in 1913, founded Modernize Tailors on Pender Street in Vancouver’s Chinatown.

In early October 1919, the family, with the exception of Connie, returned to China, moving first to a home in Canton (Gwang2 zau1 or Guangzhou) before settling in Hong Kong. LAM Tuck Yew then married for the second time. This was still a common practice amongst traditional Chinese men, to have one legal wife and one or more concubines.  The name of this woman has been lost to the family, and much of her time may have been spent caring for LAM Tuck Yew’s grandmother. Three children were born from this relationship, including daughter Bo Kam, in August 1921.

To LEUNG Yuet Wah, a son, Paul, was born in December 1921, but LAM Tuck Yew was absent for this occasion, for he had returned to Steveston the preceding August. It’s likely he did so before his two-year certificate of leave expired. He did travel back to Hong Kong for another two-year period though, from February 1927 to January 1929.  Another son, Peter, was born in January 1928. The last son, Tommy, according to Maisie’s father Samuel Milton, died in a childhood drowning accident back in Canada.

The LAM family circa 1928: back row, l. to r.: Rose, Nellie, Mae; middle row, l. to r.: Alice, LEUNG Yuet Wah, Peter, Margaret, LAM Tuck Yew, Edith; front row, l. to r.: Paul, Samuel Milton. LAM family collection and City of Richmond Archives photograph #2026 39 3

For the next six years, LAM Tuck Yew lived apart from his family. Connie, after a brief stay in Hong Kong, had left Canada for the United States in December 1925. She moved to New York, then pursued studies in Sociology at the Woman’s College of the University of North Carolina. After graduation in 1933, she was awarded a fellowship at the New York School of Social Work. In 1936 she returned to China, living and working in Hong Kong, assisting refugees during the war.

Back in Steveston, LAM Tuck Yew continued working alongside his brother LAM Ching Ling (also known as LAM Duck Hui). The Hong Wo & Co. store and Richmond Gardens were doing a profitable business. 

On the farm, LAM Tuck Yew (right) with his son-in-law, Albert Chan. LAM family collection and City of Richmond Archives photograph #2026 5 8

While work undoubtedly occupied most of his time, LAM Tuck Yew still involved himself in local LAM/LIM clan affairs. He joined the Lim Sai Hor Association, which was based in Vancouver’s Chinatown, but originally established in Victoria in 1908. The current association, the LIM Sai Hor Kow Mock Benevolent Association, has occupied the same building at 531 Carrall Street since 1946.

In December 1935, Samuel Milton, age 16, returned to Canada. Whether he was called back by his father or did so on his own accord, Maisie and her family do not know.   

Chinese Immigration C.I.44 form of Samuel Lim. The Registrar, Fred W. Taylor, is Hockey Hall of Fame member “Cyclone” Taylor. Library and Archives Canada https://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.redirect?app=immfrochi&id=258741&lang=eng&ecopy=t-16184-02739

Milton, as he preferred to be called, soon began attending class at Vancouver Technical Secondary School, travelling there by the interurban tram from Steveston. His command of the English language was good enough to enable him to enter straight into the tenth grade.  Subjects he enjoyed were many, including English, math, science, literature, history, philosophy and religion. This interest in obtaining a good education reflected his father’s similar outlook, and this road was travelled by several other of LAM Tuck Yew’s children.

Time on the weekends for Milton was often spent helping at the Hong Wo store and farm operations.

Milton (right) with Victor Lam. LAM family collection and City of Richmond Archives photograph #2026 5 9

From another LAM clan family friend, he learned to drive a tractor and a truck, eventually delivering groceries to customers in New Westminster, North Vancouver and Vancouver. Perhaps this was all viewed as preparation for his eventual inheritance of a share in the family business.

Milton learned to drive a tractor from a family friend. LAM family collection and City of Richmond Archives photograph #2026 5 3

On 20 August 1939, LAM Ching Ling died. His death was noted in the Vancouver press, who remembered him as a prominent merchant of Steveston. LAM Tuck Yew may have then become the senior member of the Hong Wo store staff, but the business arrangements between his family and his brother’s heirs remained unchanged. 

Maisie and her family are unaware if LAM Tuck Yew ever returned to Hong Kong and China after 1929. His wife, LEUNG Yuet Wah, had been living there since 1919, and her Canadian immigration certificate of leave had expired in 1923, making her ineligible for automatic re-entry into Canada. 

C.I.9 travel document issued to LEUNG Yuet Wah in 1919. Canadian Research Knowledge Network https://heritage.canadiana.ca/view/oocihm.lac_reel_t16591/828

The children were all growing into adulthood and striking out on their own.

Nellie had attended Hackett Medical College in Canton, then did post-graduate studies at the New York Columbia Medical School for one year in 1930. After working at several postings in the United States, she returned to China in January 1933 to serve as a professor of gynecology, obstetrics, and pediatrics at the Kwang Ha Medical College in Canton. Nellie later engaged in private practice in Nanking before settling in Hong Kong.

Mae trained to become a nurse and then worked in real estate after her return to Canada in 1953.

In Hong Kong, Rose, also a nurse, befriended John Davis, a British police officer who led intelligence forces in Japanese-occupied Malaya in 1943. She had spent time there in the late 1930s. 

Edith helped her husband operate a ferry service in Hong Kong after the war and then worked as a seamstress in Vancouver. 

Alice graduated with a Master of Arts degree in psychology from New York’s Columbia University in 1950. After practicing at a private school for boys in the U.S. she returned to Vancouver for a career in the real estate industry (Family lore also has her involved in some international intrigue, perhaps a subject for a future post!)

Margaret taught music after immigrating to San Francisco.

Paul transferred from school in Hong Kong to UBC and graduated in commerce circa 1946. At some point, he provided bookkeeping help at the Hong Wo & Co. business, tracking sales and orders. He proceeded to Temple University in Philadelphia for graduate studies in business administration and finished his PhD course work at New York University. One of his classmates at Temple was David Lam, who went on to experience great success in business and became the 25th Lieutenant Governor of British Columbia. By the mid-1950s, Paul had established his import-export business, Continental Trading Enterprises Ltd. in Vancouver’s Chinatown. He returned to Canada permanently in 1957. 

Peter went to McGill University in Montreal in the early 1950s and graduated with a Civil Engineering degree. Some of his early employment included work on dam projects in Quebec and then in B.C. with Alcan and B.C. Hydro. 

LAM Tuck Yew did not live to see how his children born after Nellie and Connie prospered later in life. He surely would have been pleased to know about the schools they attended, the training they received and the degrees they earned. He died on 27 September 1943 in Steveston.

LAM Tuck Yew, circa 1940. LAM family collection and City of Richmond Archives photograph #2026 39 1

At the time of his death, his son Milton was the only immediate family member who was living in Canada. Milton had enrolled in engineering at UBC circa 1941, along with Jack and Bill Wong, whose father was operating Modernize Tailors in Chinatown. Maisie remembers her father recalling the times he and the brothers commuted to school together and how he once drove them all to UBC in a farm vehicle. Their mathematics professor was very much amused at the sight. The Wong brothers graduated circa 1946/47.  Their degrees however essentially proved worthless, for a Chinese person could not legally enter the engineering profession in BC during these years. To obtain a license required being eligible to vote in the provincial election, which the Chinese were denied until after 1947.

Upon LAM Tuck Yew’s death, Alice volunteered to lead the family in fulfilling their responsibility in the running of the Hong Wo & Co. store and Richmond Gardens. Milton however left his studies at UBC to take on this role.

The farm greenhouse operations. LAM family collection and City of Richmond Archives photograph #2026 5 15
This cheque, dated 13 July 1945, is signed by two people, including Milton Lam. Milton took on an active role in managing the Hong Wo & Co. business. City of Richmond Archives photograph #2026 12

He continued to do so until he married in 1948, at age 28. Milton had met LAU Mo Ying at a party hosted by friends he had made during one of his trips to Hong Kong to visit his mother.

Milton, Mo Ying and LEUNG Yuet Wah in Hong Kong, circa 1948. LAM family collection and City of Richmond Archives photograph #2026 39 7

They returned to Canada soon after and LAU Mo Ying was introduced to life on the farm in Steveston. 

Mo Ying (Maureen) working on the farm. LAM family collection and City of Richmond Archives photograph #2026 5 7

The transition to this new way of living proved to be a challenge however, and so, Milton retired from the Hong Wo & Co. and Richmond Gardens business. In early 1950, the LIM Saw (LAM Tuck Yew) family shares were sold to the LAM Ching Ling family, and Milton’s cousins George, Mary and Jessie Lam took over the operations of the firm. 

Agreement document, 1950. LAM family collection and City of Richmond Archives photograph #2026 5

The doors of the Hong Wo & Co. store closed permanently in 1971, and the building sat vacant for another six years.  Demolition occurred in 1977.

Final days of the Hong Wo & Co. store. LAM family collection and City of Richmond Archives photograph #2026 5 20

Milton had sponsored his mother’s application for immigration to Canada and approval was granted by the Canadian government in November 1949. LEUNG Yuet Wah however passed away in 1950 in Hong Kong. She had lived a full life there, strongly connected to a wide variety of people including those in business and government, who accorded her great respect.

Milton and Mo Ying, who had adopted Maureen as her name, began raising their family. By the early 1960s there were five children: Eunice, Nathan, Michael, Brian, and Maisie. Maureen found employment as a nurse’s aide at Vancouver General Hospital and volunteered her time playing piano at the Christ Church of China in Chinatown and then the Vancouver Chinese Pentecostal Church.

After leaving the Hong Wo & Co. store, Milton worked at the Post Office sorting mail.  He later began training as a social worker, taking some classes at UBC and working for a variety of federal, provincial, and local agencies around the province. His job was eventually centred in Vancouver’s Chinatown and Downtown Eastside (often referred to as Skid Road during Milton’s time working there) where he assisted many elderly Chinese with pension and social services applications and language translation services.  He was well suited to this work, as Milton was an intelligent, honest, kind, generous and compassionate man.

Maureen died in 1999, and Milton passed away in 2013.

Today, the family of LAM Tuck Yew and LEUNG Yuet Wah has grown to its sixth generation.  The key role their elders played in this important chapter of Richmond’s history was remarkable, but knowledge of these events has mostly been confined to LAM family conversations and memories. With Maisie and her brother Michael‘s great help however, the connection between the LAM Ching Ling and LAM Tuck Yew families and their partnership during the first half of the twentieth century have now been revealed.

LAM family gathering circa 1973, l. to r.: Josephine, Eunice, Mary, Pamela Wong, Mae and Jessie. LAM family collection and City of Richmond Archives photograph #2026 5 5

The LAM family records, photographs and artefacts they have donated to the City of Richmond Archives have been received with much gratitude and these will soon be available for research purposes. And though it has been exciting to receive so much new information about the Hong Wo & Co. store, there is more to learn and tell. The City of Richmond Archives looks forward to working with the extended LAM families in this endeavour.

The next instalment in this series of stories about the early Chinese Canadians settlers in Richmond will focus on YUEN Jae Tong and his family. The land they farmed was located at Jacombs Road and Bridgeport Road, the site of present-day Richmond IKEA.

Richmond’s Early Chinese Canadian Settlers: LAM Ching Ling and CHEW Gore

Clarence Sihoe 5 November 2025

Introduction

In late 2017, after almost fifteen years of research, I completed a book that explored the history of my mother’s family in Canada. Driven by curiosity and passion in equal measure, the work enabled all in our extended family to better understand our roots in this land and strengthen the bonds that keep us closely connected. It was satisfying to finally get the project done.

My maternal grandfather, YEE Clun, left his home village in Hoi-Ping (Kaiping) county, Kwangtung (Guangdong) province, China, and arrived in Victoria in September 1902. He paid the head tax of $100 to enter the country. Working first as a labourer, he eventually earned status as a merchant, owning and operating a number of restaurants and cafes and an import-export business in small towns and cities across Saskatchewan. This enabled him to bring my grandmother, ARNG Woon Goke, to Regina in late 1919, exempt from the head tax. There they raised a family of six children until their return to China in 1932. They reunited in Regina in 1941 and finally settled in Vancouver in the fall of 1947.

My journey to uncover these details led me down a countless number of trails: some productive, others complete dead ends. I arranged many conversations with my mother, aunts and uncle; organized a small part of our collection of family photographs; visited libraries and archives in B.C. and Saskatchewan; read dozens of articles and newspaper stories on the internet; and requested and received documents from various provincial and federal government agencies. Of great value early on were the materials held by the Vancouver Public Library Chinese Canadian Genealogy section. The records held by Library Archives Canada were also very useful, particularly the Immigrants from China database, and they continue to be an important resource for family historians and professional genealogists alike.

The year 2023 was recognized as an important date by many members of the Chinese Canadian community, for it marked the one hundredth anniversary of the passing of the Chinese Immigration Act of 1923. This federal legislation, commonly known as the Chinese Exclusion Act, more or less ended immigration of the Chinese people to Canada. There were few exceptions to this legal form of discrimination. For a quarter century until its repeal in 1947, this unjust and cruel law kept thousands of men living and working in Canada apart from their wives and children who remained in China. Some of these so called “bachelors” never reunited with their families, and they died alone in a country that may have welcomed them at first but then denied them a chance to fully participate or contribute towards the growth of this society. The Paper Trail to the 1923 Chinese Exclusion Act, an exhibit curated by Catherine Clement, explored this dark period in our history and was featured at the Chinese Canadian Museum, located in Vancouver’s Chinatown, for eighteen months that began on 1 July 2023. A digital archive of the documents displayed at the exhibition is held at UBC Library, Rare Books and Special Collections. https://rbscarchives.library.ubc.ca/paper-trail-collection

These historical facts have led me to think more about Richmond. I worked within its local government for almost three decades and I’ve resided here since 1991. My aunt, uncle, and cousins lived near the corner of No. 1 Road and Francis Road in the 1960s, but recently I began to wonder about the Chinese people who settled here over a century ago. Who was present when the Exclusion Act came into force in Richmond? The stories of the Chinese fish cannery workers and farm labourers have been documented, mostly single men who worked these seasonal jobs, and then perhaps retreated to Vancouver’s Chinatown during the wintertime. But what of the families who may have lived here? How many men and women were fortunate enough to stay together, earn a living, and raise a family on Lulu and Sea Islands? 

My research these days focuses on discovering the identities of these people, and I begin with LAM Ching Ling, proprietor of the Hong Wo Store in Steveston. His career as a general merchant, farmer, and labour contractor is well known, and has been highlighted in an informative and interesting post from May 2023, researched and written by John Campbell, Social Media Coordinator with the Friends of the Richmond Archives. https://richmondarchives.ca/2023/05/11/peace-together-ling-lam-and-the-hong-wo-store/  

To start my search, I visited the City of Richmond Archives last fall. Knowledgeable staff there pointed me towards an impressive number of municipal and community records available for consultation. These included Council minutes, voters’ lists, and directories. Most important was A Thematic Guide to the Early Records of Chinese Canadians in Richmond, prepared for the Archives by Claudia Chan in August 2011. It is an excellent summary of all the records pertaining to early Chinese Canadians held by the Archives at that time. Reading this led me to the biography files of some of the early Chinese pioneers of Richmond, LAM Ching Ling among them.

His connection to the fishing and farming industries was well documented, but more personal details about his life with family and community were scant. Using the array of genealogical resources now available, my goal is to begin adding extra layers of details to his biography, so that we may better come to know this important figure in the story of our City. I see this as the first in a series of similar stories about the other Chinese Canadian pioneer families of Richmond.

 

LAM4 Zoeng1 Ling6 (in Jyutping Cantonese romanization); LIN Zhang Ling (in Pinyin Mandarin romanization); LAM Ching Ling.

LAM Ching Ling was born on 1 August 1873 in Sun Wui county, Kwangtung (Guangdong) province, China.  Sun Wui is also known as SunWoy and as XinHui in Pinyin. The village where he is from has been written as Goo Chung, Goo Dung and Kwo Jung in various Canadian government documents.

Ling LAM (City of Richmond Archives Accession 2013 52.)

He arrived in Vancouver, B.C. in March 1890 aboard the vessel S.S. Abyssinia, and registered with the authorities on 7 March 1890. Prior to departure from Hong Kong, he had paid the $50 head tax to enter Canada.

His name was recorded in the General Register of Chinese Immigration as JUNG Ah Tuen and his entry is given the Ottawa serial number 6242, in row seventeen about two-thirds down the page.

The Register recorded various details about each individual; name, port, place and date of registration; number and date of issue of any certificates received; amount of head tax paid; sex; age; city or village, district, province of birth in China and last place of domicile; occupation; and the port and date of arrival and name of vessel on which the immigrant arrived.

LAM Ching Ling or JUNG Ah Tuen as he was then called, was listed as a “Canneryboy” and it’s notable that his height of five feet one inch was recorded and various facial markings such as moles and scars were listed under column nineteen, Physical Marks or Peculiarities. The Canadian government went to great lengths to identify and keep track of all these immigrant to the country.

General Register of Chinese Immigration page for LAM Ching Ling, serial no. 6242, http://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.redirect?app=immfrochi&id=6242&lang=eng

During his lifetime in Canada, LAM Ching Ling was known by various names. These included JUNG Ah Tuan, JUNG Ah Leun, LAM Ling, LEM Ling, CHUNG Chong, LIM Chong Ling, Hong Woo LAM and Hong Wo LAM. He is listed as LAM Duck Hew on some documents issued to his children.

He was commonly referred to as LAM Ching Lam, which may be spelled in Jyutping as LAM4 Zoeing1 Ling6. (The numbers refer to the Cantonese language tones.) The Chinese characters for this name are shown on his Chinese Immigration C.I.9 travel certificate issued in 1927, and are read from left to right.

C.I.9 travel permit issued to JUNG Ah Luen in 1927 https://heritage.canadiana.ca/view/oocihm.lac_reel_t16601/382

On his grave marker at Mountain View Cemetery in Vancouver, his name written in Chinese characters can be spelled in Jyutping as LAM4 Dak1 Diu6. This may be his name taken after marriage. LAM is the first character of the column, Dak Diu are the third and fourth. The second character, Gong, is an honorific used to respectfully refer to the deceased male.

Grave marker of LAM Ching Ling, Mountain View Cemetery, Vancouver, B.C. C.Sihoe photograph, 2025.

 ZIU6, Zhao, Chew, Chiu, Chu, Jew

CHEW Gore was born on 9 April 1875, in Sun Wui (Sun Woy, Xinhui) county, Kwangtung (Guangdong) province, China. Some documents list her birth village as Sue Kai; others list it as Kwo Jung, the same village where her husband was born.

Photograph from LAM Chew See’s C.I.44 document issued in 1924. https://recherche-collection-search.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/home/record?idnumber=254727&app=immfrochi&ecopy=t-16183-00109

She departed from Hong Kong aboard the vessel Empress of Japan and arrived at Vancouver in June 1899.  She was registered under her birth name JEW Gow.

General Register of Chinese Immigration page for JEW Gow, serial no. 30707. http://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.redirect?app=immfrochi&id=30712&lang=eng

She had travelled to Canada with her husband, LAM Ching Ling, recorded this time in the General Register as LEM Ling, and their seven months old daughter, LEM Kim Fon. LAM Ching Ling had returned to China sometime in the late 1890s.

He was now classified as a merchant and head tax payments for himself and daughter LEM Kim Gon were later refunded. It would be expected that JEW Gow, being a merchant’s wife, would have been exempted from the head tax payment as well, but she was classified as a housewife upon entry and pays the $50 fee.

After marriage JEW Gow would often be referred to as LAM Chew Shee, meaning “a woman born of the CHEW clan and married to a LAM”. 

LAM Ching Ling and LAM Chew Shee had six children:

The eldest child and first daughter was Kim Fon, also known as Fanny. She was born in 1898, in China. She died in 1918.

The next five children were all born in Canada. Names are shown in English, Jyutping, and Pinyin romanization.

Mary (LAM4 Ping4 Ngoi3, LIN Pingxi) born, 31 October 1900, died 1990;

George (LAM4 Fuk1 Tin4, LIN Futian) born, 20 March 1904, died 1970;

John (LAM4 Fuk1 Coeng4, LIN Fuxiang) born in 1908, died 1922;

Jessie born on 24 October 1910, died in 1995; and

Dorathea (LAM4 Cai4 Mei5, LIN Qimei, ) born on 9 September 1916, died in 1947.

Mary LAM was born in Steveston. A doctor was present at her birth. LAM Duck Heu is named as her father and it is recorded that she is the second child born to CHEW Shee. Their address is given as 1452 East 11th Avenue in Vancouver.

Birth Registration certificate for Mary LAM. https://search-collections.royalbcmuseum.bc.ca/Image/Genealogy/f722893d-be21-43ab-bfc8-3248a82fad44 

An entry for the LAM Ching Ling family has been recorded in each Census of Canada for the years 1901, 1911, 1921, and 1931. (The microfilm records of these documents are often of poor quality, making the deciphering of the census taker’s handwriting difficult. Sometimes the handwriting itself is almost illegible. The names given are taken from the Ancestry.ca website, and often represent their researcher’s “best guess”.)

In the 1901 Census of Canada, LAM Ching Ling is listed as LING Lim, 28, living and working in Richmond, B.C. as a General Merchant. Named, as well, are his wife, Gem Ling, 26, and two daughters: Com Fung Lung, 2, and Ping Wye Ling, 1., lines 39-42. http://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.redirect?app=census&id=33558608&lang=eng

In the 1911 Census of Canada, he is listed as HONGWO, Isac, 37, and residing at 9 Broadway E. in Vancouver. His family includes wife Laren, 35, and five children: daughters Mung, 12, Mary, 10, and Bessie, 8 months; and sons George, 7, and Charot, 2., lines 22-28.  http://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.redirect?app=census&id=6818361&lang=eng 

Entry for the LAM Family in the 1911 Census of Canada.

In the 1921 Census of Canada, he is listed LING Lenn, 48, and residing at 605 Broadway E. in Vancouver. His spouse is Chee Ling, 46, and their five children are George, 17, John 13, Mary, 20, Jessie, 10, and Dora, 5., lines 44-50.  http://central.baclac.gc.ca/.redirect?app=census&id=66466013&lang=eng 

In the 1931 Census of Canada, he is listed as LAM Hongwo, 57, and living at 1452 East 11th Avenue in Vancouver. He is classified as a merchant working in a general store. Family members include wife Stell, 55, and four children: Mary, 28, Jessie, 20, George, 26, and Dora, 15., lines 42-47.  http://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.redirect?app=census&id=85837223&lang=eng  

On 28 June 1924, in Vancouver, LAM Ching Ling, and his family, registered as per Section 18 of the Chinese Immigration (Exclusion) Act of 1923. Every person of Chinese descent or origin (i.e. immigrant or native-born) was required to register his or her presence with a government official. These were often local police officers or postmasters.  LAM Ching Ling was issued C.I.44 certificate number 52656. Note that he is referred to as CHUNG Chong.

http://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.redirect?app=immfrochi&id=254954&lang=eng 

On this document, his family is listed as: wife LIM Chew Shee, 1 son LIM Fook Ten (George), 3 daughters LIM Ping Oy (Mary), LIM Chu Yen (Jessie), and LIM Tie Mee (Dora).  Daughter Fanny (Kim Fon) had passed away in 1918, and second son John in 1922.

http://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.redirect?app=immfrochi&id=254727&lang=eng 

http://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.redirect?app=immfrochi&id=254662&lang=eng 

http://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.redirect?app=immfrochi&id=254664&lang=eng

http://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.redirect?app=immfrochi&id=254658&lang=eng

http://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.redirect?app=immfrochi&id=254660&lang=eng

The Canadian government implemented an expansive system of paperwork to record, track, monitor and control the movements of the Chinese people travelling to, from and within Canada. Upon arrival and after registration, a new immigrant would receive their head tax certificate, known as the C.I.5 or C.I.30 if exempted from payment, which served as the primary means of identification. If lost or destroyed, a C.I.28 was issued as a replacement.

JEW Gow’s C.I.5 certificate is replaced by C.I.28 certificate no. 12219, on 1 December 1924, although it had been endorsed as early as 28 June 1924. 

Page from the C.I.28 Register for JEW Gow, no. 12219. https://heritage.canadiana.ca/view/oocihm.lac_reel_t3486/710

On 13 June 1925, LAM Ching Ling’s C.I.5 certificate, is either lost or damaged, and is replaced by C.I.28 certificate no. 12350.

Page from the C.I. 28 Register for LAM Ching Ling, no. 12350. https://heritage.canadiana.ca/view/oocihm.lac_reel_t3486/711

During this time, any Chinese person wishing to leave Canada temporarily had to apply for a special travel document known as a C.I.9 certificate. On 7 July 1927, the LAM family received theirs for an intended trip to Seattle, Washington by CPR Local rail. On LAM Ching Ling’s C.I.9 no. 59670, his proper name is given as JUNG Ah Luen. https://heritage.canadiana.ca/view/oocihm.lac_reel_t16601/382

Note the lack of a signature on CHEW Gore’s document. https://heritage.canadiana.ca/view/oocihm.lac_reel_t16601/383

In the 1931 Census of Canada, LAM Ching Ling and his family are listed at 1452 East 11th Avenue, District 235 Vancouver Burrard, sub-district no. 52, Vancouver City, p.9. He is named as LAM Hongwo. Occupations are listed for each family member: LAM Hong Wo – merchant; his wife Shee – homemaker; Mary – teacher; Jessie – stenographer; George – laborer; and Dora – student.

LAM Ching Lam died on 20 August 1939. His obituary appeared in the Vancouver Daily Province, 21 August 1939. page 13.

The funeral procession was noted in the Vancouver Sun, 24 August 1939, page 12.

Services for LAM Ching Ling were described in the Vancouver Daily Province, 24 August 1939, page 24. Note the mention of a brother living in Steveston.

LAM Ching Ling is interred at Mountain View Cemetery in Vancouver and is recorded as CHUNG Ling Lam in its database. https://covapp.vancouver.ca/BurialIndex/PersonDetail.aspx?PersonId=d1c14bed-1f6c-420e-a290-2c63fbdcbc7e

LAM Chew Shee died on 20 February 1947.  Place of burial is Mountain View Cemetery, Vancouver, B.C. Her obituary appeared in the Vancouver Daily Province, 22 February 1947.

Most members of the LAM family are interred or commemorated at Mountain View Cemetery, in Vancouver, B.C. Photographs were taken on 22 March 2025.

Translation of the Chinese characters is approximately as follows. 

On the left side, four characters: Woman of the CHEW clan who entered the LAM household.

On the left side column: The grave of Mrs. LAM Dak Diu.

On the right side column: The grave of Mr. LAM Dak Diu

Frank Shong is the husband of Mary Mah.

Conclusion

The City of Richmond Archives has a significant number of records from the Hong Wo Store. These records, currently being cleaned by a conservator, will be accessible to researchers, possibly by the end of 2025. A preliminary review of some of these documents, as well as others, leads me to believe that LAM Ching Ling’s brother was involved in the store’s operation. That idea, the achievements of some of the children of LAM Ching Ling and CHEW Gore, and the stories of Richmond’s other pioneer Chinese Canadian families, will all be the subjects of posts in the future.

Moving Pictures – Movie Theatres in Richmond

Movie theatres are usually marked by a well lit marquee to attract the eye and advertise the features playing there. This example is from the Richmond Square Twin Theatres. City of Richmond Archives photograph 2008 39 2 16.

Motion Pictures have been entertaining people since the first public showings in the 1890s. In 1898, Vancouver’s first motion picture was played in a warehouse on Cordova Street by John A. Shuberg, a Swedish immigrant who had purchased one of Edison’s Kinetograph machines, the first commercially available projector. The show featured moving images from the Spanish-American War with Shuberg adding sound effects from behind the screen by banging sheets of tin and shooting guns. After a two-week sold out run he took the show on the road, building a portable tent theatre and touring around Canada and the United States. Upon returning to Vancouver in 1902 Shuberg opened the “Edison Electric Theatre” on Cordova Street, converting the Central Hotel into Canada’s first movie house. The movie industry has grown exponentially since those days, surviving the Great Depression, World Wars and predictions of its impending doom because of influences like television, home movie rentals and streaming services. Richmond has had a number of venues where locals could enjoy a the latest Hollywood release without leaving the community. Here are the places that they could go to enjoy a movie over the years.

This marquee pointed the way to Richmond’s Delta Drive-In Theatre. City of Richmond Archives, George Bergson photograph 2016 19 18217.

The Richmond Theatre

Eugene Greczmiel was a well-known and respected resident of Richmond whose life story is filled with tales of entrepreneurial determination and success. In 1929 he opened the Richmond Theatre, the first one in town. The theatre was located on Moncton Street in a building which survived the 1918 Steveston Fire and still stands today. Greczmiel played silent movies twice a week at the picture show and included imported Japanese films to attract moviegoers from the large Japanese Canadian population in Steveston.

This image of athletes participating in the first Kendo tournament held in Steveston is believed to have been taken inside the Richmond Theatre. City of Richmond Archives photograph 1977 7 4.

When “talkies” became the latest thing he built his own sound head for the projector for a cost of $175, saving thousands on the cost of buying one. In his own words, “It worked, but it wasn’t very good.” “Lots of music, little speech.” Around 1932 Mr. Greczmiel opened the Marpole Theatre on the Vancouver side of the River and the Richmond Theatre was closed. The building at 3700 Moncton Street was the location of the Redden Net Company for many years and at present is a dental office.

This building at 3700 Moncton Street was the location of Richmond’s first moving picture show. City of Richmond Archives, Graham Turnbull photograph.

The Steva Theatre

Richmond’s next movie theatre was also located in Steveston. In 1945, Washington Thorne moved to Richmond from Saskatchewan, along with his wife Helen and son Brian. Bemoaning the fact that Richmondites had to travel all the way to Vancouver to go to a movie, in 1946 he began the transformation of the former Japanese Buddhist Temple on First Avenue into a 420 seat movie house.

The Steva Theatre is shown here, ca. 1950. Playing the week the picture was taken were “The Flame and the Arrow” (1950) with Burt Lancaster and Virginia Mayo, “The White Tower” (1950) with Claude Rains and Glenn Ford and “Road Show” (1941) with Adolphe Menjou and Carole Landis. City of Richmond Archives photograph 2010 51 1.

The building was rewired and a decorative façade added to the front. Red leather seating with wooden arm rests were installed, a stage was erected and “teaser” curtains hung on either side to frame the twelve by sixteen foot, glass beaded movie screen.

A pair of reupholstered seats from the Steva Theatre are preserved in the Richmond Museum’s artefact collection. City of Richmond Collection 020.15.1

Restrooms, a concession stand and projection room were constructed. The Steva Theatre opened for business on October 3, 1947 with a sold-out showing of “Black Beauty” starring Mona Freeman and Richard Denning.

A light box sign from the Steva Theatre ticket office window. City of Richmond Collection 023.23.2

There were living quarters in the back of the theatre that the Thorne family occupied. The family also made up most of the theatre’s staff, Wash Thorne doing promotional work as well as operating one of the two projectors along with a hired projectionist, Helen and a friend took care of the ticket booth and concession stand and Brian sold popcorn outside to the people lined up on the sidewalk. Janitorial duties were shared by everyone. Three different movies were played each week and matinees for the kids were played on Saturdays. Even with a busy showing schedule like this, there was seldom an empty theatre. Mr. Thorne’s prowess at bidding for movies often resulted in new releases being shown at the Steva before they hit the theatres in Vancouver. Admission in the late 1940s was ten cents for features and five cents for matinees.

Special events to attract movie goers were another factor in the Steva’s success. “Foto Nites” were one event used by theatres around North America. Audience members and participants in an amateur contest would be given numbers. The winner of the contest would reveal their number and if an member of the audience had the same number they would have their “Foto” taken and be awarded the prize of $200, a nice sum in the 1950s! The “Foto” would be posted at the theatre, the whole procedure necessary to avoid breaking any laws about gambling or lotteries.

A program for movies showing at the Steva in February and March 1951. City of Richmond Collection S980.59.1

To take advantage of the 1950s 3-D movie craze, Mr. Thorne upgraded the theatre, installing a 20 HP generator, a new sound system and a polarized screen. In August 1953 Paramount’s first 3-D picture, “Sangaree,” played for a full week, followed by “House Of Wax” with Vincent Price in September. Cardboard 3-D glasses were included in the price of admission.

Ad for the first 3-D movie in August 1953. City of Richmond Archives Reference Files.

The Steva Theatre closed in 1960 and the building was sold in 1972. Today in the building where excited children filled the seats to see the latest Western, other children attend a daycare and children’s learning centre.

The Lulu Theatre

The March 5, 1947 issue of the Richmond Review announced the granting of two licenses for “Two New Theatres For Richmond – One at Steveston, One at Brighouse.” The one at Steveston was of course the Steva Theatre. The second, the “Brighouse Theatre” proposed by Peter Barnes of the Photo Night Company and backed by Harry Reifel, required the construction of a new building. There were many delays that affected the building of this theatre. Another company had already been granted a license in 1946 to build a theatre in the Brighouse area which stipulated that no other theatre could be built within two and one half miles. The failure of this company to show any progress on the project resulted in the withdrawal of their license allowing construction to begin. The building at 608 No. 3 Road was put up by Alex Mudry, A.G. Silverton and William Thomson who then sold it to Peter Barnes, “an expert at the business” who owned and operated theatres around the lower mainland and in Ontario.

The Lulu Theatre, shown here in 1958, was in the heart of Brighouse at 608 No.3 Road. City of Richmond Archives photograph 1988 18 31.

Barnes changed the theatre’s name to The Lulu Theatre and outfitted it with the “very newest of equipment.” The front of the building featured a neon lit marquee topped by a tall vertical floodlit structure with three foot tall red letters spelling the word “LULU”.

The interior of the theatre was decorated in shades of red and blue. Seating for 449 people was provided, upholstered in wine coloured fabric with wood arms. Carpeting was wine coloured and the draw curtain in front of the screen was in magenta with gold satin trim.

This January 4, 1956 ad from the Richmond Review shows the Thursday night prize for “Foto Nite” at the Lulu. “Foto Nite” promotions were used to attract patrons to theatres on normally low attendance nights in the 50s.

The Lulu had its first showing on May 12, 1948 with “Blue Skies” starring Bing Crosby, Fred Astaire and Joan Caulfield, a musical comedy based on a story by Irving Berlin. Opening night was attended by Reeve R.M. Grauer who congratulated Alex Mudry, A.G. Silverton and William Thomson on the accomplishment of having the theatre built and ready in only four months, introduced the owner and operator Peter Barnes and declared the theatre open. The Lulu played three different movies a week, featured “Foto-Nite” contests on Wednesday and Thursday and Saturday matinees. Admission for adults was 40 cents, children 20 cents, matinees were 25 cents for adults and children 5 cents.

This Lulu Theatre program advertises what’s on in October 1956. City of Richmond Reference Files.

It is not known exactly when movies stopped being shown at the Lulu Theatre but advertising for coming features in the Richmond Review newspaper stopped after the March 26, 1958 edition. The building remained in use as the home for a variety of businesses until it was demolished in the late 1990s.

The Delta Drive-In

The headline in the January 21, 1953 Richmond Review read, “Richmond to Have Drive-in Theatre For This Summer.” The Chechik Brothers from Mayer Enterprises had requested to Municipal Council that 40 acres of land purchased from L.F. Mitchell on No.5 Road, just north of Mitchell School, be rezoned to allow the construction of the “Fraser Drive-In Theatre.” The brothers were well prepared for their presentation to Council, with plans for dealing with traffic and noise and with references and photos from other communities where Mayer Enterprises had set up and operated other Drive-ins, proving that the development would be a “credit to the community.” The rezoning was granted after the obligatory waiting period and construction began.

An article in the Richmond Review announces the proposed Drive-In.

It only took ten weeks for construction to be completed. This included the laying of forty thousand yards of sand, twelve thousand yards of gravel and the driving of 20 piles to support the 50 foot wide screen. A building was erected to house the cafeteria style snack bar and projection room equipped with a 100 amp water cooled projector powered by a 20 horsepower generator. A playground was installed to keep the kids occupied while Mom and Dad enjoyed the movie with sound track provided by speakers which hooked inside the window of the car. The name of the drive-in had also been changed to the “Delta Drive-In”

This artist’s conception printed in the Richmond Review shows the plan for the proposed Drive-In Theatre.

In March a request to council was made on behalf of the owner of the Lulu Theatre for the rezoning of land next to the unfinished Delta Drive-In for the building of a second drive-in. This request was objected to by the RCMP, Public Works and community groups and was subsequently rejected.

The opening night announcement published in the Richmond Review on May 13, 1953.

The Delta Drive-In opened for business on Wednesday, May 13, 1953 with a showing of “Ten Tall Men,” a French Foreign Legion Action, Adventure movie starring Burt Lancaster. Also shown was the Walt Disney live animal Feature “Beaver Valley” and a cartoon. Admission for adults was 60 cents on weekdays, 75 cents on Saturdays and holidays, students (12 to 18 years) 40 cents on weekdays and 50 cents Saturdays and holidays. Children under 12 got in free.

This 1977 aerial view shows the Delta Drive-In with No.5 Road running diagonally behind the screen. City of Richmond Archives, George McNutt photograph.

The Delta Drive-In operated until 1980, featuring films of every genre and offering space for well attended “Swap Meets” on Sundays. By 1984 the land was being redeveloped for townhouse complexes and single family dwellings and the old entrance to the Delta Drive-In was replaced by Greenland Drive.

This 1981 image shows the Delta Drive-In sign, the speaker stands and the snack bar and projection building being torn down in the background. City of Richmond Archives, George Bergson photograph 2016 19 18218.

The Famous Players Richmond Square Twin Theatres

The Richmond Square Twin Theatres were located in the west parking lot at the Richmond Square Shopping Centre in a stand alone concrete building. It was Richmond’s first multi-screen cinema.

This image from the January 17, 1968 Richmond review shows the beginnings of construction on the Twin Theatres.
The Famous Players Richmond Square Twin Theatres. City of Richmond Archives photograph 1983 7 1.

The theatre opened on June 27, 1968 with the features “The Odd Couple,” starring Jack Lemmon and Walter Matthau and a Disney feature, “The One and Only, Genuine, Original Family Band” with Walter Brennan, Buddy Ebsen, Disney staple Kurt Russell and the film debut of his future wife, Goldie Hawn.

An opening night advertisement from the Vancouver Sun newspaper.

The theatre expanded to three screens in 1980 and had seats for 1126 people. In 1990 the theatres were closed and the building was demolished to make room for the construction of the Richmond Centre Mall parkade.

The demolition of the Richmond Square Theatres in 1990. City of Richmond Archives photograph 2008 39 4 591.

The Famous Players Richport Cinemas

Famous Players opened the Richport Cinemas on December 13,1985 at the Richport Centre at the intersection of No.3 Road and Ackroyd Road.

The Famous players Richport Cinemas in 1989. City of Richmond Archives photograph 2008 39 2 68.

The Cinemas had two screens, each seating 398 for a total of 796 seats. The feature attractions on opening night were “Rocky IV,” starring Sylvester Stallone and Talia Shire and “Spies Like Us” with Chevy Chase and Dan Aykroyd.

A December 10, 1985 Vancouver Province opening night advertisement for the Richport Cinemas.

Richport Cinemas were taken over by Cineplex Odeon following the opening of the Richmond Centre 6 by Famous Players. Due to competition from the SilverCity Riverport, the Richport was closed in 1999 and was renovated for use as retail space.

Famous Players Richmond Centre 6 Cinemas

Famous Players opened the Richmond Centre 6 Cinemas in the Richmond Centre Shopping Mall on November 23, 1990. Famous players President and CEO Ronald Emilio said, “We have created a completely new complex in the Richmond Centre to replace a triple screen theatre. The new complex will bring back a sense of occasion to moviegoing in Richmond.”

The Famous Players Richmond Centre 6 Cinemas marquee outside the west entrance of Richmond Centre Mall. City of Richmond Archives photograph, Accession 2009 16.

The entrance to the theatres was closest to the west entrance of Richmond Centre Mall. The lobby was designed to resemble a night time streetscape with marquees showing theatre names and movie titles. Each of the six screens at the theatre complex had an individual name, Century had 466 seats, Metro had 370, Rialto had 358, Majestic had 285, Olympia had 266 and Regent had 234 for a total of 1979 seats, including 28 wheelchair accessible ones. The theatres were equipped with large screens, Dolby SR sound systems, 70mm film capability and luxurious seating with plenty of legroom.

An opening night newspaper ad.

The feature films played on opening night were “Rocky V” starring Sylvester Stallone and Talia Shire, the Disney animated feature “Rescuers Down Under,” “Ghost” with Patrick Swayze, Demi Moore and Whoopi Goldberg, the World War Two bomber drama “Memphis Belle,” “Jacob’s Ladder” with Tim Robbins and “Three Men and a Little Lady” with Ted Danson, Tom Selleck and Steve Guttenburg. Cineplex Odeon took over operations of the Richmond Centre 6 in 2005 and the Famous Players Richmond Centre 6 Cinemas closed on March 27, 2011.

The Richmond Centre 6 Marquee inside the mall. Photo from Cinema Treasures website.https://cinematreasures.org/theaters/34887/photos/24666

Riverport SilverCity

The Famous Players Silvercity Riverport complex was built during a huge expansion of the company’s business, taking advantage of the latest advances in cinema and sound technology. The theatre was built at the massive Riverport Sports and Entertainment complex which included attractions like the Richmond Ice Centre, the Watermania Aquatic Centre, a bowling alley, brew pub, White Spot Restaurant, etc.

This image from the November 12, 1997 Richmond News shows the Silvercity Riverport still under construction.
An opening night ad from the December 17, 1997 Richmond News.

Famous Players Director of Public Relations, Dennis Kucherawy stated, “We’re building state-of-the-art theatres that will allow people to see motion pictures as they’re meant to be seen by directors, which is larger than life on a big screen with big sound.”

The $12.7-million, 7200 square metre, 12 screen complex opened on Wednesday December 17, 1997 with a special benefit night. Attendees were treated to the best movies of 1997 for a $2.00 admittance fee and half price food. All proceeds from the night were to benefit Ronald McDonald House. An additional six screens and an IMAX theater were opened on December 18, 1998 bringing the total number of theatres to 19 with seating for a total of 4,508, with the smallest theatre seating 168 and the largest 446.

Cineplex Odeon took over operations in 2005. The Cineplex Odeon Silvercity Riverport remains today as Richmond’s only remaining movie business, but offers more individual screens than all the its predecessors combined.

The Riverport Silvercity Cinemas, 2023. Google Maps photo.

Who knows what the future of the movie theatre will be? In spite of the easy availability of movies, streamed straight to big screen televisions in the comfort of your own home, the experience of going out to the movies with other people still remains popular. Theatres have evolved to entice modern audiences with comfortable seating, amazing sound systems and high definition projection. Concession sales make up a large portion of the profits earned by theatres today and while traditional theatre snacks like popcorn, soft drinks and candy are still there, wraps, sandwiches, hot dogs and nachos are now available, along with a side of fries or poutine. Other features like arcades, bowling alleys and even bars offer other activities for moviegoers. It seems like the days of going to the movies in Richmond will be with us into the foreseeable future.

Keeping an Industry Afloat – Thomas Goulding’s Cork Mill

Anyone who has lived along the water in areas where the fishing industry operates is familiar with fish net floats. Picked up on beaches while beachcombing, strung on ropes to make ornamental fencing or to decorate the verandas of beach cabins, floats are an instantly recognizable symbol of life on the beach.

A man hauls in a gillnet fitted with cedar corks in this image ca. 1960. City of Richmond Archives photograph 1985 4 134.

Plastic floats have taken over the market since the 1950s, but before then fishing floats were almost exclusively made of cork or wood. The wooden ones were known as “cedar corks” and the only commercial supplier of them on the West Coast was Thomas Goulding who produced them in his Cork Mill at the Acme Cannery on Sea Island.

Surrounded by cannery housing, these three canneries dominated the south-west shore of Sea Island. At the bottom is the Fraser River Cannery, in the middle is the Vancouver Cannery and at top is the Acme Cannery where the Cork Mill was located. City of Richmond Archives photograph 1985 166 10.

The Acme Cannery was built in 1899, part of the boom in cannery construction during the late 19th and early 20th centuries to take advantage of the seemingly unlimited supply of salmon available in the Fraser River. In 1902 it was absorbed into the British Columbia Packers amalgamation. In 1918 it closed, but the buildings, net racks and moorage were maintained for the community of fishermen, mostly Japanese, who lived around it. In a small building on the west side of the cannery Mr. Goulding set up the cork mill. The building and all the equipment for the mill, the saws, the lathes, the reamer, the stringer and the tar vat were all hand-built by him with help from his Japanese neighbours.

Framed in red in this image, the cork mill is the small building visible next to the white wall of the Acme Cannery. Next to it are the net racks where the bundles of corks were hung to dry. Image cropped from City of Richmond Archives photograph 1985 166 10.

Work at the Cork Mill was seasonal. It sat idle during the fishing and canning season, operating only during the winter and spring. Western red cedar logs were supplied by coastal fishermen, found floating free or onshore in the Gulf of Georgia or possibly “liberated” from booms. The logs were cut into “cork bolts,” about four inches by four inches by four feet long.

Making the corks was fairly straightforward. The cork bolts were cut into blocks of either six or eight inches. A hole was bored through the centre of the cork which was smoothed and chamfered to prevent damaging the fishing net’s rope. The corks were then turned into their oval shapes on the mill’s lathes. A good day’s work could produce 2000 corks, ready for the next step in their production.

This map from the 1936 Waterworks Atlas shows the layout of buildings around the Acme Cannery. City of Richmond Archives image

Tom Goulding’s granddaughter, Doreen Montgomery Braverman, worked at her grandfather’s cork mill occasionally after school and described her part in the process. “The next step was to thread them onto twine in lots of ten. That was the job they sometimes let me do. A reef knot tied the twine together so the floats could be dipped into a vat of hot tar to preserve them. They dried on net racks next to the vat.”

Completed cedar corks were likely shipped out by boat, there being no road access to the mill. Distribution of the product was carried out by the various fishing companies, BC Packers, Nelson Brothers, J.H. Todd, Canadian Fishing Company, etc. The users of the corks were gillnet fishermen who would attach the floats to their nets using a crochet stitch. This was another job which could be done by young people, earning $15 per net, a job that could take several days.

Nets hung in a net loft are fitted with cedar corks in preparation for the upcoming fishing season in this image, ca. 1930. City of Richmond Archives photograph 1985 4 124.

Running the mill required a number of workers. Fishermen, both Japanese and European, found and delivered cork bolts. The mill itself had a core group of workers. Gordy Bicknell was second in command at the mill. Alice Gillespie, Francie Edwards, family members, neighbours and friends rounded out the workforce. When the Japanese families were forcibly removed from the West Coast in 1942, the loss of the work provided by those neighbours caused difficulty in supplying cork bolts for the mill, but work continued.

By the 1950s the use of plastic foam corks was cutting into demand for the ones produced at the mill. Around 1954 an expansion of the Vancouver Airport resulted in a runway extension into south-west Sea Island signaling the doom of the small community and industries there. The land was expropriated by Crown Assets, houses were torn down or moved and the canneries were razed, along with the cork mill. The only evidence of their existence that remains are old pilings that once supported the canneries.

A salmon gillnet is supported by a net rack on a Steveston dock, its corkline fitted with modern plastic foam corks. City of Richmond Archives photograph 1985 4 2436.

See also https://richmondarchives.ca/2015/01/06/japanese-canadians-on-sea-island/

Carhops and Nineteen-Cent Burgers: Richmond Cruises the Drive-in

An iconic symbol of youth and car culture during the ’50s, ’60s and ’70s was the drive-in restaurant. Popularized during a thriving post-war economy, the baby boom and the rapid growth of car ownership, drive-ins typically featured large parking areas and little or no indoor seating. Menus, visible from your car, displayed inexpensive meals which included burgers, chicken and fries. In contrast to the modern “drive-thru” concept, many drive-ins were self serve, where you walked to a window, ordered and picked up your food and took it back to your car. Others provided car service, your order taken and food delivered to your car by staff known as “carhops” who would attach a tray to your window with your meal on it. “Lights On For Service!”

The first McDonald’s outside the United States was this one on No.3 Road in Richmond. A great example of fast food architecture, this standardized McDonald’s design featured an eye-catching “Golden Arches” sign at the entrance and a distinctly shaped yellow, red and white building with an angled roof supported by two arches. The building design is carried over to the logo on the sign with its two arches and angled line across them, replicating the building when viewed at an angle from the street. City of Richmond Archives photograph 1987 61 3.

The first known drive-in, Kirby’s Pig Stand, was built in Dallas, Texas in 1921 and was described by critics as for people who were “too lazy to get out of their car and enter the restaurant.” In British Columbia, the first White Spot drive-in opened in Marpole in 1928, a brand which pioneered the use of carhops and window trays. Drive in architecture often featured round or polygonal buildings which allowed vehicles to park around the building giving easy access to cars. Some buildings would include eye-catching features or rooflines and large colourful signs to entice customers into their lots. Kitchens were usually laid out in an efficient manner allowing quick production of meals and were sometimes visible from inside or outside the restaurant. Drive-ins could be single small businesses or larger regional chains with multiple locations. Some evolved into huge national and international brands which are still around today.

The Seabright

Richmond’s first drive-in style restaurant/snack bar was the Seabright. It was built and run by the Doherty family, owners of the Seabright Dairy on Sea Island and was positioned to give customers a good view of aircraft landing and leaving from the new Vancouver Airport, a popular attraction in the 1930s. The building was about 40 feet by 24 feet in size and an eight-foot wide veranda gave customers some covered space. Soft drinks, homemade ice cream and milkshakes, tea, coffee and sandwiches were offered for sale at the building on Buckingham Road and plenty of parking was available in the 240 by 70 foot parking lot.

The Seabright is shown here ca. 1936. City of Richmond Archives photograph 2000 3.

The Garden City Drive-In

Around 1954 a restaurant opened at 802 Garden City Road (8020 today), near the intersection with Blundell Road. The Garden City Drive-In was owned by Marg and Marc Champoux and offered dining room or car service. By 1960 it had become Wong’s Garden City Drive-In, offering a selection of Chinese and Western dishes with dining room, car service or free delivery.

A Richmond Review ad for the Garden City Drive-In from January 15, 1958.
Richmond Review ad for Wong’s Garden City Drive-In from 1960.

Sometime during the 1960s the drive-in was renamed the Richmond Drive-In, a name it had until about 1973 when it became Wah Do Restaurant.

The Garden City Drive-In can be seen in the centre of this photo beside the garage on the corner of Garden City and Blundell Roads. Cropped from City of Richmond Archives photograph 1978 37 11.
A menu from Wong’s Garden City Drive-In. City of Richmond Archives Accession 2019 49.

Around 1975 the restaurant was closed and demolished to make way for construction of the Garden City Shopping Centre.

The Dairy Queen

On September 5, 1958, Ray Van Humbeck opened his new Dairy Queen ice cream business at 633 No.3 Road (6331 today), a standard drive-in design with a large parking lot and free standing sign featuring an ice cream cone to attract customers. He offered a free sundae, milk shake or malt with every one purchased at regular price on opening day. Dairy Queen products were “favourites for people like you in 2500 cities throughout Canada, the Commonwealth and the United States. They enjoy it as a treat for taste – a food for health!”, stated his ad in the Richmond Review.

Ray Van Humbeck’s Dairy Queen is shown in the centre of this image with a car entering from No.3 Road. Cropped from City of Richmond Archives photograph 1984 17 58.
Grand Opening advertisement from the Richmond Review, 1958.

Ray Van Humbeck was a local businessman who believed in giving back to his community. He supported many community initiatives, including sporting events and sponsored a softball team for many years.

The 1969 Dairy Queen softball team. City of Richmond Archives photograph 2017 45 5.

Starting out as a business selling soft frozen dairy products in Joliet, Illinois in 1940, the Dairy Queen brand grew and spread; the first Canadian store opening in Estevan Saskatchewan in 1953. The product line evolved and expanded from sundaes, shakes, malts and banana splits to include such favourites as the “Dilly Bar,” “Buster Bar,” the “Scrumpdillyishus Peanut Buster Parfait” and the “Blizzard.” The franchise’s menu made a significant change when hot “Brazier Foods” became available, cooked in the trademark “Sizzle Kitchen.” Mr. Van Humbeck’s No.3 Road Dairy Queen changed along with the times, receiving new signage and a raised red roof along the way.

Taken in 1971, this photograph shows the Dairy Queen building after being modified and equipped with equipment for the serving of hot “Brazier” foods. City of Richmond Archives photograph 1983 7 9.

Around 1974, Ray Van Humbeck closed the business on No.3 Road and relocated to the Anderson Square Shopping Centre, occupying three units where Anderson Road met Buswell Road. The business became a fixture there until it closed in 2016. Today there are three Dairy Queen stores in Richmond, one at No.3 Road and Francis Road, which was relocated from the Buswell and Anderson location, one at the Minato Village at Steveston Highway and No.1 Road and one located in the food fair in Richmond Centre Mall, not far from the location where Mr. Van Humbeck opened the first one in 1958.

Chipper’s Drive-In

In January 1957 an application was made for the sub-division and rezoning of a property on No.3 Road to allow the construction of a meat packing plant for the B.C. Chip Steak Co. Ltd. and a drive-in restaurant. The application was approved and the plant and drive-in, known as Chipper’s, opened at 331 (3311 today) No.3 Road in July 1958.

Chippers’ announced their opening in this July 30, 1958 ad in the Richmond Review.

Chipper’s was the first “American Graffiti” style drive-in in Richmond. It was very popular meeting place with the young crowd, frequented by hot rodders and drag racers and was the terminus/turn around point for people cruising the No.3 Road strip. Chipper’s advertised a variety of food, from chipped steak on a bun and beef burgers (Made in our own factory from government inspected beef), all you can eat waffles for seventy-five cents (the ones they had in mind when they invented syrup), nineteen cent burgers (Take home a dozen!) and pizza by Tevie (The King of Pizza). Owner/operator Tevie Smith promoted his business actively, using advertising space in the Richmond Review frequently and by sponsoring bowling teams at the Skyway Lanes next door while offering ice cream and burgers as prizes.

Chipper’s took advantage of its proximity to the Skyway Lanes bowling alley, building business by associating themselves with the sport. Richmond Review ad 1965.
Chipper’s was a self-service drive-in but also offered fast home delivery. Richmond Review 1965.
Chipper’s ads usually pointed out that the drive-in was close to the Skyline Hotel, Richmond Review 1965.

Not all of the advertising for Chipper’s was good. In April of 1962 reports of bad behavior and hooliganism by unruly customers were common and led to the Municipal Licensing Committee and the RCMP meeting with one of the owners of the restaurant regarding disturbances at the drive-in. The owner promised the Committee that he would clear up the problem immediately and the Committee in turn promised that they would “keep in close touch with the situation.”

This 1970 aerial view shows the location of Chipper’s in relation to No.3 Road, the Skyway Lanes Bowling Alley and the BC Chip Steak Co. meat packing plant. Immediately to the left of the restaurant is a tire shop. Cropped from City of Richmond Archives photograph 1983 6 90.

The warnings must have had an effect because the drive-in remained in business until the early 1970s and remains a nostalgic memory in the minds of folks who were young during that era.

Kings Burgers

An article in the January 25,1962 Richmond Review announced “Two new drive-ins to be built here”. One of the new facilities was Kings Burgers to be built on Westminster Highway near the intersection with No.3 Road. Kings Drive-In Ltd. was a successful Lower Mainland chain that opened six locations around Vancouver, North Vancouver, Burnaby, Surrey and Richmond. The property that the Richmond location was built on first had to be rezoned from agricultural district to general commercial, with a special use permit as drive-ins were not included in that category.

A car enters the parking lot of Kings Burgers from Westminster Highway in this aerial photograph from 1964. The building was typical of drive-ins of the period. Just above Kings is the Super Valu store which faces on to No.3 Road. Cropped from City of Richmond Archives photograph 1984 17 61.

Like Chipper’s, Kings Burgers became a well loved and popular drive-in, especially with younger people. Driving by the restaurant gave a view of hot rods, sport cars and modified vehicles, hoods up in the parking lot. No doubt many strips of rubber marked the exit from the drive-in’s parking area.

A menu for Kings Burgers, printed in the Richmond Review.

Kings’ menu was also typical of drive-ins of the period. Burgers, fries, fish and chips with an apple turnover for dessert pretty much covered it. The restaurant’s “Kingburger”, prepared in advance and kept in a heated drawer, was its most popular item at 19 cents each.

Kings Burgers in December 1976 as renovations begin. City of Richmond Archives photograph 2021 29 32.

Kings did not escape the stigma of having young people as a large part of its customer base. In June 1966 the Richmond Review reported “HOODLUM VICTIMS PROTEST,” detailing complaints from the Royal Canadian Legion, located across the street from the drive-in, about willful damage caused by the “young element”. The Legion claimed that groups gathering outside the restaurant would move across to the Legion and break into cars and destroy property. “They have no regard for private property,” the Legion protested. The Municipality’s Licensing Committee agreed to seek the cooperation of the drive-in’s management to combat the problem.

Kings Burgers in April 1977 after renovations. City of Richmond Archives photograph 2021 29 33.

From late 1976 to early 1977 the Kings underwent renovations and began to look less like a drive-in and more like a regular restaurant. Around 1981 the name was changed to “Big B” Burgers and later around 1986 it became Umbertino’s Pasta Palace. In 1987 the location is listed as “Vacant” in the street directory.

The A&W

The other restaurant mentioned in the January 25, 1962 Richmond Review was an A&W drive-in, to be built on the west side of No.3 Road just south of Capstan Way. The A&W did not have an easy start in Richmond. The first hurdle encountered were delays in rezoning the property where it was to be built. Although announced in January, by April rezoning was still being squabbled about by the Municipal Planning Committee with some wanting to delay for another year. Representatives for the A&W were upset, saying that they had been all but guaranteed of the rezoning eight months earlier. The delay was partly in response to a public outcry over perceived problems arising from the project. Under a headline which read “Rootbeering teens bring angry protest,” an article in the Richmond Review said that Council had been petitioned by an angry group of homeowners who claimed that allowing another drive-in to open in their neighbourhood would affect property values, add to litter problems, attract undesirable types of teenagers and keep residents awake at night. Most of these problems already exist to some extent because of the existing drive-in (Chippers). “It’s not an environment that I want for my boys”, said one protester. “Young hot rodders and young fellows and girls acting in an unbecoming manner. We see enough of this already”. Despite protests and zoning application issues the restaurant opened at its location at 359 No.3 Road (3591 today) and became another popular location for youth and car enthusiasts. The drive-in provided full carhop service, occasionally with the servers on roller skates, delivering food on the iconic window trays with tall, frosty mugs of root beer.

Carhop Linda Billwiller, carries trays of root beer to a customer at the No.3 Road A&W, ca. 1969. Photo from Facebook post, link here.

Like many large drive-in chains, A&W got its start in the United States in 1919 when Roy W. Allen set up a stand selling root beer at a parade in Lodi, California. In 1923 he and his partner Frank Wright opened the first A&W restaurant in Sacramento. A&W grew their business, selling franchises throughout the United States and expanded into Canada in 1956. By 1960 there were 2000 A&Ws in operation. In 1972 the Canadian side of the business split from the American chain and became its own corporate entity. The No.3 Road A&W Drive-in closed around 1982 but today there are nine A&W outlets in Richmond.

Ernie’s Take Home – Kentucky Fried Chicken

Harland David Sanders began selling chicken dishes from a restaurant in Kentucky during the Great Depression. By 1940 he had developed his patented “secret recipe” for cooking chicken in a pressure fryer, allowing faster cooking than regular frying. In 1952 Sanders, by now a “Kentucky Colonel” commissioned by the Governor of Kentucky, began offering franchises for his “Kentucky Fried Chicken”. In the 1950s Nat Bailey was offered the British Columbia franchise for Kentucky Fried Chicken. While he was worried that the brand might compete with his White Spot chain, which also offered chicken dishes on the menu, his partners convinced him that the product was different enough to not cause any issues. Bailey and his partners formed a separate company called Ernie’s Fine Foods which was named after Ernie M. Creamer, Bailey’s friend and partner who was to head the new enterprise. Six stores were opened in Vancouver, Victoria, New Westminster, North Vancouver, Penticton and Richmond under the name Ernie’s Take Home. The Richmond store opened in a unit at the Hyland Park Shopping Centre at 632 (6320 today) No.3 Road.

This ad from a 1965 Richmond Review invites customers to pick up a bucket or two of Colonel Sanders’ “Finger-Licken’ Good” chicken from Ernie’s Take Home at the Hyland Park location.

Colonel Sanders came to Vancouver to meet his new business partners after they had opened three of their franchises. He was described as a “real southern gentleman”, wearing his trademarked white suit, string tie, goatee and cane and kissing all the ladies’ hands. Unlike other Kentucky Fried Chicken franchises, Bailey and his partners served their own style of potato salad, macaroni salad, coleslaw and biscuits, apparently with the Colonel’s approval.

Nat Bailey sold his restaurant businesses to General Foods in 1968, including the company’s six Ernie’s Take Home locations. By the early 1970s they had closed the Hyland Park location, reopening in a red and white striped drive-in style restaurant at 810 (8100 today) Anderson Road, on a lot that spanned the area between Anderson Road and Granville Avenue. In 1984 the restaurant had changed its address to 8111 Granville Avenue, rebranded as Kentucky Fried Chicken, without the Ernie’s Take Home name, and had installed the iconic bucket of chicken signpost to attract customers driving down busy Granville Avenue. A second location at the Seafair Shopping Centre opened the same year. Today there are four KFC outlets in Richmond.

McDonald’s

In 1960 Ray Kroc took over a restaurant run by the McDonald Brothers in Sacramento California and the rest is history. Over the next five years Kroc transformed the business, opening hundreds of locations featuring unique architecture and high efficiency kitchens serving inexpensive meals, and turning McDonald’s into a public company listed on the New York Stock Exchange. In 1967 Kroc took his business outside of the United States for the first time, opening a restaurant at 712 (7120 today) No.3 Road in Richmond on June 1. George Tidball was in charge of the Canadian inaugural operation, and Richmond was chosen because, according to Kroc, it was a community of many young adults in the middle income bracket. The chain was distinguished by its 18 cent hamburger, ” formula boneless chuck and plate beef, 10 hamburgers to the pound,” and a “Triple thick” 25 cent milkshake.

The McDonald’s Drive-In on No.3 Road on July 21, 1974. City of Richmond Archives photograph 2021 29 4.

McDonald’s was notable, not only for its unique architecture and cheap meals, but also for its lack of some other things. There were no juke boxes or cigarette machines, “They don’t enhance the image we want,” said Kroc. Also, there were no telephone booths or female employees, “Girls and telephones are distractions.” Ray Kroc explained, “We are not interested in motorcyclists, hot rodders or rock and rollers unless they come on our terms. We run a clean place that welcomes families, boy scouts, church and civic groups.”

Ad from Richmond Review July 2, 1967.

George Tidball stated that the Richmond restaurant provided fulltime employment for 36 young people, adding that one out of every five applicants passed the rigid requirements for the job, a much higher amount than in the United States: “Richmond seems to have a greater number of neat-appearing, responsible, clean-cut type of youth.”

Ray Kroc, behind the counter of the Richmond McDonald’s, serves a meal to his wife during their visit. Photograph from the July 26,1967 Richmond Review.

Ray Kroc made a whirlwind trip to the Richmond McDonald’s the month after it was opened, staying for about a half hour to look over the operation, speak to the press and have a photo-op. Then he was gone, planning the opening of other restaurants around Canada.

The original McDonald’s, ready to be torn down, stands beside its replacement in this image from March 2, 1975. The Golden Arches remained there and are still there today in front of the third restaurant to occupy the site. City of Richmond Archives photograph 2021 29 8.

In 1975 the original drive-in was replaced by a larger, more modern building with room for indoor seating, a play area, and eventually, a drive-thru window ending its state as a drive-in. The restaurant has since been replaced by a third building on the property but the original 1967 Golden Arches are still there attracting drivers into the the place. Today there are seven McDonald’s locations in Richmond, but only one can claim to be the location of the first outside the United States. There are still no cigarette machines or juke boxes, but everyone has a telephone in their pocket and women are allowed to work there now.

The second McDonald’s on No.3 Road, ca. 1975. City of Richmond Archives photograph 1987 61 1.

White Spot

Nat Bailey got his start selling hot dogs and ice cream from a converted Model T Ford truck in Stanley Park, probably Vancouver’s first food truck. He opened the first White Spot Restaurant in Marpole in 1928, a place which was probably the first drive-in restaurant in Canada. Bailey and his partner Bob Stout are also credited with developing the world’s first drive-in food tray, originally a white-painted cedar plank which was placed across the space between the driver’s and passenger windows, modernized later using plastic and steel. White Spot was also probably the first drive-in to employ carhops to serve customers in their cars.

The trays used by carhops at White Spot were an early innovation in the history of drive-in restaurants. Photograph from White Spot Facebook page, link here.

Bailey retired from the restaurant business in 1968 after building and expanding the chain into one of the best-loved restaurant/drive-in chains in BC. When he retired he sold the business, which included 13 White Spot Drive-In/Dining Room Restaurants, six Kentucky Fried Chicken franchises and other assets such as BC’s largest chicken farm, to General Foods. General Foods was based in New York State with a Canadian office in Toronto. The company immediately started to expand the business building new restaurants. Around 1975 they built Richmond’s last true drive-in at 814 Granville Avenue.

The White Spot on Granville Avenue, across the road from the end of Buswell Street, ca. 1975. Cropped from City of Richmond Archives photograph 1987 23 313.

The restaurant offered both dining room and carhop service, with all the favourite White Spot menu items available. Around 1999 the Granville Avenue restaurant closed, replaced by other non-drive-in locations around town. Today there are three White Spot Restaurants in Richmond with an additional two Triple O’s franchise locations.

A view down Granville Avenue, ca.1995, shows signs for two drive-ins, Kentucky Fried Chicken on the left and White Spot farther down on the right. City of Richmond Archives photograph 2008 39 7 248.

By the 1970s drive-ins were being replaced by drive-thru restaurants which didn’t require as much parking space and, as carhops became obsolete, could be run by fewer employees. There are a few old style drive-ins remaining, but they have become a thing of the past for the most part.