Richmond’s Early Chinese Canadian Settlers, No.2: LAM Tuck Yew, LEUNG Yuet Wah and The Hong Wo & Company Store – A Family Connection

Clarence Sihoe 22 October 2026  

Genealogical research often takes you to unexpected places. The twists and turns on the road to discovery are numerous and family historians know this well. So I experienced during my search for LAM Ching Ling, CHEW Gore and their family. They are, of course, synonymous in Richmond’s written record with Hong Wo & Company General Merchants and were the subjects of the first story in this series about the early Chinese Canadian settlers of Richmond. https://richmondarchives.ca/2025/11/06/richmonds-early-chinese-canadian-settlers-lam-ching-ling-and-chew-gore/

LAM family collection and City of Richmond Archives #2026 5

My close look into their lives began in mid-2024, and uncovered facts previously unknown or forgotten. We now have the dates of their first arrival in Canada, the ships on which they sailed, the addresses of the homes in which they lived, the names and birthdates of the children–all details that add to our knowledge of their history.

Certain discoveries I made along the way however confused the picture. First, while reviewing LAM Ching Ling’s biographical file that is held within the City of Richmond Archives, I came across the 2013 obituary of Samuel Milton LAM. The statement that he was born in Steveston part of the Hong Wo Lam Family made me pause. I knew of Mary, George, Jessie and Dora, and later learned of Fannie and John, all children of LAM Ching Ling and CHEW Gore, but Samuel wasn’t, as far as I could tell, part of this family group. What was going on here?

More puzzle pieces appeared. In recent years, thousands of records related to Chinese immigration to Canada were released by Library and Archives Canada and made available to the public. Chinese Canadian historians – family and professionals alike – rejoiced, despite the dark origins of these records. 

For example, under section 18 of the Chinese Immigration Act, 1923, the Canadian government created and maintained a list of Chinese who registered as native born. The LAM Ching Ling children, all born in Steveston, B.C., were included in this list, and for each a Chinese Immigration C.I. 44 certificate was created indicating their status. Also registered was Miss Constance LAMB, born on 12 November 1904, in Steveston, B. C., and on her certificate her parents were identified as LIM Saw and LAUNG Shee. 

1923 Chinese Exclusion Act – Exhibition and Archive https://1923-chinese-exclusion.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/CANADIAN-BORN-registered.pdf

Was Miss Constance LAMB actually Constance LAM?  The LIM and LAM surnames share the same Chinese character.  Interesting. Here we had children who were born in the same town, around the same time early in the twentieth century, and were similar in name. I wondered, was there a connection to be made here? 

Chinese Immigration C.I.9 travel documents were also the source of valuable information.  Any Chinese person travelling outside of Canada, who had an intention to return, were required to apply for these papers. In September 1923, Constance (Connie) prepared for a trip to Hong Kong and on her document was the notation she was

personally known to LAM Ling of Steveston to whom I would refer you for correctness of statements herein made.

I thought, was this the LAM Ching Ling, proprietor of the Hong Wo & Co. store?

Other records revealed that Connie had an older sister, Nellie Lim. Nellie’s C.I.9 certificate from 1932 stated that she was born in Canada and her current place of residence was Steveston, care of the Hong Wo Store! The evidence was mounting. I was now confident in thinking that a link of some kind existed between these two families.

C.I.9 travel document issued to Nellie Lim, Library and Archives Canada https://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.redirect?app=immfrochi&id=106652&lang=eng&ecopy=e008282568

A search into the records of Constance and Nellie’s father, LIM Saw, revealed more clues. I learned that he entered Canada in 1894 under the name LUM Won Saw and that he was known most often in later life as LAM Tuck Yew. Admitted as a labourer, he eventually gained merchant status while operating a general store, but which one? How many general stores were Chinese operated in Richmond during the 1920s? The Hong Wo & Co. store was the best known and had reportedly been in existence since 1895.

C.I.9 travel document issued to LAM Tuck Yew in 1927. Canadian Research Knowledge Network https://heritage.canadiana.ca/view/oocihm.lac_reel_t16600/2430

The General Register of Chinese Immigration indicated that LIM Saw brought his wife LAUNG Shee over from China in July 1912. From a variety of documents I examined, I concluded that together they had at least ten children, including their eldest son, Samuel Milton, born in 1919 at

Lulu Island (No.3 Road, near London, B.C.)

the man whose obituary I found in LAM Ching Ling’s biographical file!  

LAM Ching Ling died in 1939 and in his death notice it was mentioned that among his survivors there was a brother living in Steveston. The brother’s name however was not given.  LIM Saw died in 1943. His obituary appeared in the newspapers of the day in September 1943, and he is identified as Tuck Yew LAM,

the proprietor of Hong Wo and Co., Steveston.

Vancouver Daily Province, Tuesday, October 5, 1943 page 5.

Finally, all the bits and pieces had come together. These two men were brothers, and LIM Saw had succeeded LAM Ching Ling in the running of a business. The success of the Hong Wo & Co. general merchant store and farming operation stemmed from the hard work of two families rather than just one!

All this investigative work had taken over a year to complete. I understood the basic connection between the LAM Ching Ling and LAM Tuck Yew families but of course many details were still unknown. I continued my search and in March 2025 and again in August I posted comments about my research in the Facebook page of the Genealogy for Asian Canadians group.https://www.facebook.com/groups/1923544271050858 I was puzzled about apparent disconnects in names within the LAM Ching Ling family and needed help in translation, and various members made comments and suggestions. The responses were much appreciated. What I hadn’t noticed until a few months later was a reply that read in part:

My Grandfather was the brother of Lam Ching Ling.  He also helped run the Hong Wo store and farm in Steveston.  His name was LAM Tuck Yew.

Good fortune had arrived! A LAM Tuck Yew family member had reached out and could help put the pieces of the Hong Wo & Co. store story I had collected, into their proper place.

So, since November 2025 I have met with Maisie LAM several times to hear her talk about her side of the “Hong Wo family.” Maisie is the daughter of Samuel Milton, granddaughter of LIM Saw, and grandniece of LAM Ching Ling. She expressed surprise that so much material about the LAM Ching Ling family was stored at the City of Richmond Archives and that people were interested in learning about the life and contributions of the LIM Saw family line. Some of the details were even new to her. Thanks to Maisie and her extended family, our knowledge of her grandparents LAM Tuck Yew and LEUNG Yuet Wah, and of their important contribution to the Hong Wo & Co. business, is more complete than ever.

Photograph believed to be of LAM Tuck Yew, taken circa 1905 by R.H. Trueman in Steveston. Steves Family Collection, City of Richmond Archives photograph #2024 9 29

Details about LAM Tuck Yew’s early life in British Columbia, however, are scarce. Seven years after his landing in Victoria, he is recorded as living with LAM Ching Ling and family in the 1901 Census of Canada.

The 1901 Census of Canada, Library and Archives Canada https://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.redirect?app=census&id=33558619&lang=eng&ecopy=z000011324

LAM Ching Ling, his wife and their two elder daughters are listed on the first four lines of this excerpt from the census record, while LAM Tuck Yew, recorded as LIM Saw, at the bottom, is described as a lodger rather than a brother. They’re residing in some household in Richmond, B.C., possibly within quarters situated along the Steveston waterfront, amongst many other Chinese people. It may have been the living space above the Hong Wo store – Maisie believes the building was built by LAM Tuck Yew himself, having the skills of a carpenter – and the two brothers may have already been in partnership in the operation of their retail and farming business.

LAM Tuck Yew travelled back to China in 1911 or thereabouts, and returned in the summer of 1912 with his wife, LEUNG Yuet Wah, and according to the General Register of Chinese Immigration records, they were accompanied by a son, Gong Yim, eleven; and two daughters, nine-year-old Nellie and five-year-old Connie. Neither wife nor children were required to pay the $500 head tax as they were family of a Chinese man who had merchant status.

LEUNG Yuet Wah, LAM family collection and City of Richmond Archives photograph #2026 39 2

Gong Yim is absent from the LAM family history records, and Maisie is unsure if he was a son of LAM Tuck Yew and LEUNG Yuet Wah. Perhaps he was LAM Tuck Yew’s nephew or younger brother, or just another member of the LAM clan, and he may simply have gone his own way once he landed, losing contact with the family as the years passed. Gong Yim worked as a clerk, travelled back to China in 1921, and was last known to be living in Steveston in 1924, working as a farmer.

Gong Yim registered with the federal authorities as required by Section 18 of the Chinese Immigration Act of 1923. Library and Archives Canada https://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.redirect?app=immfrochi&id=212719&lang=eng&ecopy=t-16167-03065

Nellie and Connie were recorded in the General Register of Chinese Immigration as Yong Luig and Hung Jiu. Most people registered in these ledgers were arriving as new immigrants, yet both Nellie and Connie later claimed to have been born in Canada. This was important as Chinese who were native born were permitted to freely travel outside of Canada without any time restrictions. Immigrants from China who settled in Canada could not and risked being denied re-entry if they stayed outside the country beyond the two-year time limit. Extensions to four years were sometimes permitted in times of war.

Life started anew for the family in Steveston, a place that certainly must have felt very alien from their home of Sun Chan village, Sun Woy (Xinhui) county, Kwangtung (Guangdong) province in southern China. The family expanded quickly nevertheless, with the births of May 1912, Rose 1913, Edith 1915, and Alice 1917, followed by Samuel Milton in 1919, taking place in the living quarters above the family store.

LEUNG Yuet Wah and children, circa 1917. LAM family collection

Business of the Hong Wo & Co. store and the Richmond Gardens operation also appeared to be prospering. Growing and selling cucumbers to the companies who used them to make dill pickles was well under way.

Order Book, Hong Wo & Co. Richmond Gardens 1919, City of Richmond Archives accession #2019 60 11

The business shares were divided along a five-ninths to four-ninths line, with the larger portion going to elder brother LAM Ching Ling, who reportedly established the business circa 1895. While LIM Saw may have been the junior partner in the operation, he was more than just a farmer and general store merchant. He practiced Chinese medicine and signs displayed within the store premises advertised the services and products he offered.

LAM family collection

This glass sign announced that LAM Tuck Yew (first three characters, second column from right), was an “expert physician – external medicine/surgery – who trained under a Mr. LI Chung, covering everything from skin diseases and venereal diseases to bone-setting and pediatric ailments.   

The metal sign is a companion signboard listing specific medicines and products sold at the clinic: pills, plasters, and powders for pain relief, itchiness, cuts and abscesses. Harold Steves has collected various artefacts from the Hong Wo & Co. store, including bottles, jars, and small tins. Many have labels on which are written Chinese characters, (awaiting translation!). Perhaps some of them held the medicines used by LAM Tuck Yew?

LAM family collection and City of Richmond Archives accession #2026 5

As for any concern about adapting to life in Canada, Nellie appeared to have had little difficulty. She reportedly completed her high school education locally, but whether it was in Richmond or Vancouver has not yet been confirmed.

LAM family collection

Although work at the store and on the farm was probably life’s major focus, LAM Tuck Yew and LEUNG Yuet Wah came to know other members of the Chinese community living in the region, including other LAM families working in the farming industry. An important connection was made with THOM Tong Chue, also known as T.C. Thom, a missionary working in New Westminster, and one of the earliest Chinese Methodist ministers serving Chinese Canadians in British Columbia. He assisted the family in reporting Connie’s birth to the District Registrar of Births, Deaths, and Marriages. A friendship also developed with WONG Kung Lai, who in 1913, founded Modernize Tailors on Pender Street in Vancouver’s Chinatown.

In early October 1919, the family, with the exception of Connie, returned to China, moving first to a home in Canton (Gwang2 zau1 or Guangzhou) before settling in Hong Kong. LAM Tuck Yew then married for the second time. This was still a common practice amongst traditional Chinese men, to have one legal wife and one or more concubines.  The name of this woman has been lost to the family, and much of her time may have been spent caring for LAM Tuck Yew’s grandmother. Three children were born from this relationship, including daughter Bo Kam, in August 1921.

To LEUNG Yuet Wah, a son, Paul, was born in December 1921, but LAM Tuck Yew was absent for this occasion, for he had returned to Steveston the preceding August. It’s likely he did so before his two-year certificate of leave expired. He did travel back to Hong Kong for another two-year period though, from February 1927 to January 1929.  Another son, Peter, was born in January 1928. The last son, Tommy, according to Maisie’s father Samuel Milton, died in a childhood drowning accident back in Canada.

The LAM family circa 1928: back row, l. to r.: Rose, Nellie, Mae; middle row, l. to r.: Alice, LEUNG Yuet Wah, Peter, Margaret, LAM Tuck Yew, Edith; front row, l. to r.: Paul, Samuel Milton. LAM family collection and City of Richmond Archives photograph #2026 39 3

For the next six years, LAM Tuck Yew lived apart from his family. Connie, after a brief stay in Hong Kong, had left Canada for the United States in December 1925. She moved to New York, then pursued studies in Sociology at the Woman’s College of the University of North Carolina. After graduation in 1933, she was awarded a fellowship at the New York School of Social Work. In 1936 she returned to China, living and working in Hong Kong, assisting refugees during the war.

Back in Steveston, LAM Tuck Yew continued working alongside his brother LAM Ching Ling (also known as LAM Duck Hui). The Hong Wo & Co. store and Richmond Gardens were doing a profitable business. 

On the farm, LAM Tuck Yew (right) with his son-in-law, Albert Chan. LAM family collection and City of Richmond Archives photograph #2026 5 8

While work undoubtedly occupied most of his time, LAM Tuck Yew still involved himself in local LAM/LIM clan affairs. He joined the Lim Sai Hor Association, which was based in Vancouver’s Chinatown, but originally established in Victoria in 1908. The current association, the LIM Sai Hor Kow Mock Benevolent Association, has occupied the same building at 531 Carrall Street since 1946.

In December 1935, Samuel Milton, age 16, returned to Canada. Whether he was called back by his father or did so on his own accord, Maisie and her family do not know.   

Chinese Immigration C.I.44 form of Samuel Lim. The Registrar, Fred W. Taylor, is Hockey Hall of Fame member “Cyclone” Taylor. Library and Archives Canada https://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.redirect?app=immfrochi&id=258741&lang=eng&ecopy=t-16184-02739

Milton, as he preferred to be called, soon began attending class at Vancouver Technical Secondary School, travelling there by the interurban tram from Steveston. His command of the English language was good enough to enable him to enter straight into the tenth grade.  Subjects he enjoyed were many, including English, math, science, literature, history, philosophy and religion. This interest in obtaining a good education reflected his father’s similar outlook, and this road was travelled by several other of LAM Tuck Yew’s children.

Time on the weekends for Milton was often spent helping at the Hong Wo store and farm operations.

Milton (right) with Victor Lam. LAM family collection and City of Richmond Archives photograph #2026 5 9

From another LAM clan family friend, he learned to drive a tractor and a truck, eventually delivering groceries to customers in New Westminster, North Vancouver and Vancouver. Perhaps this was all viewed as preparation for his eventual inheritance of a share in the family business.

Milton learned to drive a tractor from a family friend. LAM family collection and City of Richmond Archives photograph #2026 5 3

On 20 August 1939, LAM Ching Ling died. His death was noted in the Vancouver press, who remembered him as a prominent merchant of Steveston. LAM Tuck Yew may have then become the senior member of the Hong Wo store staff, but the business arrangements between his family and his brother’s heirs remained unchanged. 

Maisie and her family are unaware if LAM Tuck Yew ever returned to Hong Kong and China after 1929. His wife, LEUNG Yuet Wah, had been living there since 1919, and her Canadian immigration certificate of leave had expired in 1923, making her ineligible for automatic re-entry into Canada. 

C.I.9 travel document issued to LEUNG Yuet Wah in 1919. Canadian Research Knowledge Network https://heritage.canadiana.ca/view/oocihm.lac_reel_t16591/828

The children were all growing into adulthood and striking out on their own.

Nellie had attended Hackett Medical College in Canton, then did post-graduate studies at the New York Columbia Medical School for one year in 1930. After working at several postings in the United States, she returned to China in January 1933 to serve as a professor of gynecology, obstetrics, and pediatrics at the Kwang Ha Medical College in Canton. Nellie later engaged in private practice in Nanking before settling in Hong Kong.

Mae trained to become a nurse and then worked in real estate after her return to Canada in 1953.

In Hong Kong, Rose, also a nurse, befriended John Davis, a British police officer who led intelligence forces in Japanese-occupied Malaya in 1943. She had spent time there in the late 1930s. 

Edith helped her husband operate a ferry service in Hong Kong after the war and then worked as a seamstress in Vancouver. 

Alice graduated with a Master of Arts degree in psychology from New York’s Columbia University in 1950. After practicing at a private school for boys in the U.S. she returned to Vancouver for a career in the real estate industry (Family lore also has her involved in some international intrigue, perhaps a subject for a future post!)

Margaret taught music after immigrating to San Francisco.

Paul transferred from school in Hong Kong to UBC and graduated in commerce circa 1946. At some point, he provided bookkeeping help at the Hong Wo & Co. business, tracking sales and orders. He proceeded to Temple University in Philadelphia for graduate studies in business administration and finished his PhD course work at New York University. One of his classmates at Temple was David Lam, who went on to experience great success in business and became the 25th Lieutenant Governor of British Columbia. By the mid-1950s, Paul had established his import-export business, Continental Trading Enterprises Ltd. in Vancouver’s Chinatown. He returned to Canada permanently in 1957. 

Peter went to McGill University in Montreal in the early 1950s and graduated with a Civil Engineering degree. Some of his early employment included work on dam projects in Quebec and then in B.C. with Alcan and B.C. Hydro. 

LAM Tuck Yew did not live to see how his children born after Nellie and Connie prospered later in life. He surely would have been pleased to know about the schools they attended, the training they received and the degrees they earned. He died on 27 September 1943 in Steveston.

LAM Tuck Yew, circa 1940. LAM family collection and City of Richmond Archives photograph #2026 39 1

At the time of his death, his son Milton was the only immediate family member who was living in Canada. Milton had enrolled in engineering at UBC circa 1941, along with Jack and Bill Wong, whose father was operating Modernize Tailors in Chinatown. Maisie remembers her father recalling the times he and the brothers commuted to school together and how he once drove them all to UBC in a farm vehicle. Their mathematics professor was very much amused at the sight. The Wong brothers graduated circa 1946/47.  Their degrees however essentially proved worthless, for a Chinese person could not legally enter the engineering profession in BC during these years. To obtain a license required being eligible to vote in the provincial election, which the Chinese were denied until after 1947.

Upon LAM Tuck Yew’s death, Alice volunteered to lead the family in fulfilling their responsibility in the running of the Hong Wo & Co. store and Richmond Gardens. Milton however left his studies at UBC to take on this role.

The farm greenhouse operations. LAM family collection and City of Richmond Archives photograph #2026 5 15
This cheque, dated 13 July 1945, is signed by two people, including Milton Lam. Milton took on an active role in managing the Hong Wo & Co. business. City of Richmond Archives photograph #2026 12

He continued to do so until he married in 1948, at age 28. Milton had met LAU Mo Ying at a party hosted by friends he had made during one of his trips to Hong Kong to visit his mother.

Milton, Mo Ying and LEUNG Yuet Wah in Hong Kong, circa 1948. LAM family collection and City of Richmond Archives photograph #2026 39 7

They returned to Canada soon after and LAU Mo Ying was introduced to life on the farm in Steveston. 

Mo Ying (Maureen) working on the farm. LAM family collection and City of Richmond Archives photograph #2026 5 7

The transition to this new way of living proved to be a challenge however, and so, Milton retired from the Hong Wo & Co. and Richmond Gardens business. In early 1950, the LIM Saw (LAM Tuck Yew) family shares were sold to the LAM Ching Ling family, and Milton’s cousins George, Mary and Jessie Lam took over the operations of the firm. 

Agreement document, 1950. LAM family collection and City of Richmond Archives photograph #2026 5

The doors of the Hong Wo & Co. store closed permanently in 1971, and the building sat vacant for another six years.  Demolition occurred in 1977.

Final days of the Hong Wo & Co. store. LAM family collection and City of Richmond Archives photograph #2026 5 20

Milton had sponsored his mother’s application for immigration to Canada and approval was granted by the Canadian government in November 1949. LEUNG Yuet Wah however passed away in 1950 in Hong Kong. She had lived a full life there, strongly connected to a wide variety of people including those in business and government, who accorded her great respect.

Milton and Mo Ying, who had adopted Maureen as her name, began raising their family. By the early 1960s there were five children: Eunice, Nathan, Michael, Brian, and Maisie. Maureen found employment as a nurse’s aide at Vancouver General Hospital and volunteered her time playing piano at the Christ Church of China in Chinatown and then the Vancouver Chinese Pentecostal Church.

After leaving the Hong Wo & Co. store, Milton worked at the Post Office sorting mail.  He later began training as a social worker, taking some classes at UBC and working for a variety of federal, provincial, and local agencies around the province. His job was eventually centred in Vancouver’s Chinatown and Downtown Eastside (often referred to as Skid Road during Milton’s time working there) where he assisted many elderly Chinese with pension and social services applications and language translation services.  He was well suited to this work, as Milton was an intelligent, honest, kind, generous and compassionate man.

Maureen died in 1999, and Milton passed away in 2013.

Today, the family of LAM Tuck Yew and LEUNG Yuet Wah has grown to its sixth generation.  The key role their elders played in this important chapter of Richmond’s history was remarkable, but knowledge of these events has mostly been confined to LAM family conversations and memories. With Maisie and her brother Michael‘s great help however, the connection between the LAM Ching Ling and LAM Tuck Yew families and their partnership during the first half of the twentieth century have now been revealed.

LAM family gathering circa 1973, l. to r.: Josephine, Eunice, Mary, Pamela Wong, Mae and Jessie. LAM family collection and City of Richmond Archives photograph #2026 5 5

The LAM family records, photographs and artefacts they have donated to the City of Richmond Archives have been received with much gratitude and these will soon be available for research purposes. And though it has been exciting to receive so much new information about the Hong Wo & Co. store, there is more to learn and tell. The City of Richmond Archives looks forward to working with the extended LAM families in this endeavour.

The next instalment in this series of stories about the early Chinese Canadians settlers in Richmond will focus on YUEN Jae Tong and his family. The land they farmed was located at Jacombs Road and Bridgeport Road, the site of present-day Richmond IKEA.

Take Cover! – Civil Defense During the Nuclear Age

After the end of the Second World War Richmond returned to a semblance of normal life. The Air Raid Precautions Brigades were disbanded, wartime activities were ended and the prospect of further wartime Civil Defence measures seemed unlikely. Then, in September 1949, a routine American Air Force Weather Service flight from Japan to Alaska picked up traces of radioactive debris in its filters, indicating that a nuclear explosion had taken place in the Soviet Union and that the Communist Bloc had tested an atomic weapon. The ensuing build-up of nuclear weapons and fear of a potential “atomic Pearl Harbor” led to the next outbreak of Civil Defense action in Richmond and in the rest of Canada.

Newspaper articles like this front page of the March 17, 1953 Vancouver Province did little to ease concerns about the threat of nuclear war.

By 1951 Ottawa had begun the process of planning for the possibility of a nuclear attack and had declared that Vancouver, New Westminster, North and West Vancouver, Burnaby and Richmond were a “Target Area” for the purpose of Civil Defense. Committees and sub-committees were organized, and a chain of command was set up. At the request of the authorities, maps were prepared by local officials showing details such as population density (day and night), transportation and communications, location of hospitals (including number of beds), schools (number of students and staff), police and fire stations, Government buildings and bridges.

The intent of the planning was to ensure the survival of as many people as possible after an atomic strike. The destruction and casualties resulting from a direct strike on Vancouver would have been massive, but it was felt that with sufficient warning and training of the civilian population, injuries, deaths and sickness from radiation could be halved.

This full-page article by reporter Bill Ryan published in the August 9, 1951 issue of the Vancouver Sun speculates on the effects of an Atom Bomb attack on Vancouver.

Newspaper articles about Civil Defense became common, giving instructions on ways to survive an “Atom Attack.” By early 1953, Civil Defense courses were offered, first a nine-week course for civilians who volunteered to become instructors and then basic general courses for the public. The federal Government sent out a convoy of tractor-trailers with an exposition on civil defense which travelled across the country, arriving at the Seaforth Armouries in late October, 1953. The displays, on loan from the USA, offered the latest information on national readiness and atomic warfare. It was expected that approximately 10% of the population would sign up for civil defense duties and many did.

This article appeared in the May 9, 1951 issue of the Richmond Review, repeating instructions from a U.S. Government publication.

In 1953, the four old A.R.P. sirens mounted at the four fire halls were the only warning devices in Richmond. At the request of the Coordinator of Civil Defense, the Richmond Superintendent of Public works produced a map showing the requirements for a system of sirens to alert all residents of Richmond. The network of sirens used 17 of the same type of units presently mounted at the fire halls, 5 horsepower electric sirens with an audible area of one mile radius. The four existing sirens could be used, but three of them would be moved for better coverage. Four air horns were to be provided for use by the fire departments. The total cost of the installed network was expected to be $12,446.72, divided equally by the Federal, Provincial and Municipal Governments, with the Federal Government supplying the sirens free of charge. New installations were to be mounted on wooden poles, supplied with three phase power, and telephone connections to allow their operation. either locally or from a control centre in Vancouver. Each siren had two signals, an undulating wail (indicating a Red Alert) and a continuous siren (indicating All Clear.) This “wish list” of siren placement never took place and it took until the 1960s for Richmond’s warning system to reach its final configuration.

Notice of the civil defense exercise in the June 17, 1953 Richmond Review. Testing of the warning system evolved into silent tests to check electrical and telephone connections, but occasional glitches caused sirens to sound and caused confusion and alarm around the community.

As more attack warning sirens were installed, they were located in a pattern to accomplish maximum coverage of the municipality. Relocation of sirens, usually because of a planned use of the siren’s original location or for upgrading, could take place provided the relocation was not much more than 100 yards away from the original location.

This siren located on Garden City Road just south of Lansdowne was a replacement for one that was on the roof of the Lansdowne Racetrack clubhouse. City of Richmond Archives photograph 1988 123 578.

By 1955, Richmond had seven air raid sirens installed. They were erected at the River Road pumphouse in Hamilton, on Tucker Avenue near No.1 Road in Terra Nova, at River Road near Duck Island and the cedar mill, the Steveston Firehall, the Municipal Hall, Mitchell School and near the airport at Lancaster Crescent. These sirens were all old style A.R.P. units, leftover from the Second World War and, over the years, most would be removed from civil defense service, replaced by more modern models in nearby locations, although some remained active for local use by the firehalls. In 1957 the siren at the Municipal Hall was moved to the top of the hose tower at the Brighouse Firehall only to be supplanted by a newer unit near the intersection of Moffatt Road and Granville on the Richmond High School grounds in 1962.

This pole-mounted siren at Richmond High School replaced one at the Municipal Hall area. Photographs of Richmond’s air raid sirens are surprisingly hard to find. Installations on or near school grounds seemed to be common with examples like this one, and others at Lord Byng School and Hugh Boyd School. City of Richmond Archives photograph.

A new siren north of Lord Byng School in Steveston took over for the one at the fire hall around 1960. A siren proposed for the intersection of Ferndale and Garden City in 1958 was installed on the roof of the Lansdowne Clubhouse and was later replaced by a modern unit on the Garden City lands. Another new siren proposed for the River Road-Shell Road intersection was installed on the roof of the Dr. Ballard’s dog food plant near River Road and No. 5 Road and was later replaced by a pole-mounted unit.

This siren at Lord Byng School, shown here in 1977, was mounted on a steel pole with a maintenance platform. It replaced the Steveston Fire Hall’s siren for Civil Defence alerts. City of Richmond Archives photograph 1978 26 34.

As sirens were added through the 1960s, coverage of the municipality improved, although there were none east of No. 5 Road until Hamilton. Richmond ended up with a total of 15 sirens in the civil defense system.

This annotated map shows the approximate locations of air raid warning sirens in Richmond. Installed from the 1950s through the 1960s, they gave warning to the most populated areas of the Municipality. City of Richmond Archives map 1987 32 10.

Information on surviving an attack continued to be provided by all levels of government throughout the 1960s. A series of free booklets, “Blueprint for Survival,” were published by the federal government and included titles such as “Fallout on the Farm,” “11 Steps to Survival,” “Survival in Likely Target Areas” and “Your Basement Fallout Shelter” were provided free from local Civil Defense authorities.

A page from the “Blueprint for Survival” booklet No. Four, sets out the eleven steps to survive a nuclear attack. City of Richmond Archives reference files.

At Richmond Municipal Hall plans were drawn up for the modification of a part of the outside of the west side of the hall to create a blast/fallout shelter using sheets of plywood and sandbags. Several building permits were issued to local residents who wanted to build similar types of shelters. Basement shelters were unrealistic in Richmond with its high water tables, so the standard of three feet of packed earth or two feet of concrete were considered sufficient for protection against radiation in an above ground shelter.

Illustrations in “11 Steps to Survival” show the difference between an air burst and a ground burst attack. City of Richmond Archives reference files.

The Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962 saw the world teetering on the edge of nuclear war and raised tensions to their highest point during the Cold War, but as time passed and the threat of mutually assured destruction created a stalemate between the nuclear powers, attitudes began to change and by the mid 1970s local officials were questioning the need for warning sirens in the community.

This clipping from the October 19, 1961 Richmond Review gives details on the modifications made to provide a bomb shelter at the Municipal Hall.

In response, Major W.W. Baldwin of CFB Chilliwack stated, “The current federal government justification on this matter is that, at present, these sirens are the only available warning system that can alert the greatest number of citizens in time to take action that will allow maximum survival or limit the effects of a surprise attack, be it nuclear or conventional in nature.” “If we wish to close our eyes to the possibility of another war then the possibility of a nuclear accident or major industrial accident such as the accidental leakage of toxic substances into the atmosphere should be considered.”

With the end of the Cold war in the early 1990s, a warning system based on 1950s technology, with all of the associated glitches and false alarms, was deemed to be no longer necessary. Between 1994 and 1996 the Department of National Defence removed all the sirens in Canada and destroyed most of them.

This siren at Victoria Park in North Vancouver is one of the few remaining Cold War era sirens. It was preserved as a Municipal Heritage site. Google Maps image.

Today, nearly everyone carries a warning system in their pocket, allowing notifications to reach a much wider part of the population. Smart phones, even with their associated glitches and false alarms, have taken the place of yesterday’s pole-mounted warning sirens.

Air Raid Precautions – Civil Defence in Richmond during the Second World War

Today, with Federal and Provincial Ministries and Municipal departments in charge of response to emergencies and most people carrying devices which can alert them in real time, it’s hard to remember a world when this kind of coordination did not exist. In Richmond the most basic kind of emergency response, fire protection, was established around 1912 in Steveston with a full time Fire Chief in charge of about 24 men. The canneries also took part, providing equipment, like a hand pump, and support, but by 1920 the Steveston fire Brigade had disbanded.

The first Steveston Fire Hall, police station and courthouse, ca. 1915.
City of Richmond Archives photograph 2006 39 64, Chilton Family fonds.

In 1922 a volunteer fire brigade was established in Brighouse under Fire Chief E.W. Ackroyd. The unit, consisting of about 10 men, raised money for equipment, used the police telephone to receive fire calls and responded quickly to calls as two of the members owned vehicles. Despite the department being well run and funded, in 1929 it too disbanded leaving Richmond with no fire department and dependent upon Vancouver Halls to respond to fires.

The Brighouse Volunteer Fire Brigade practices on an old shed near the intersection of Cambie and River Roads, ca. 1923. City of Richmond Archives photograph 1988 95 2.

This was the case until the onset of the Second World War when a Federally mandated Civil Defence program was organized. It was developed to protect civilian populations and minimize damage to materials and infrastructure from the effects of an attack from the air. This was accomplished with the formation of Air Raid Precautions Units of civilian volunteers who received training in preparedness, fire protection, rescue, first aid and evacuation. The Greater Vancouver region was divided up into 28 A.R.P. Districts, each led by a District Chief Warden and a Deputy Chief. Richmond was covered under District 21 and soon had a large cadre of volunteer wardens.

Air Raid Precautions Wardens wore distinctive uniforms with arm bands and steel helmets and received specialized training. In addition to fighting fires, they were tasked with warning the public of potential attack using sirens, whistles and noise makers. They enforced night time black-outs, making sure no light escaped from houses and industrial buildings and that vehicles were equipped with the proper headlight hoods. They distributed gas masks and stirrup pumps and trained civilians in their use. Public firefighting demonstrations were put on along with displays dealing with gas attacks and how to extinguish incendiary bombs.

The Steveston A.R.P. Volunteers demonstrate the effectiveness of the pump on their home built fire truck in April 1942. The gasoline powered pump could supply three hoses, drawing water from a hydrant or any other nearby water source. City of Richmond Archives photograph 1978 40 20.
Marpole-Richmond Review March 24, 1943.

Women’s A.R.P. groups were trained in all aspects of first aid through the St. John’s Ambulance Brigade and the Canadian Red Cross Society and took on the responsibility of setting up first aid stations, caring for casualties, raising funds and providing food and refreshments. They also took part in demonstrations and training in the use of gas masks.

The creation of the A.R.P. resulted in the first coordinated fire protection to cover all of Richmond. The Municipality was divided into six local districts, Steveston, Brighouse, Bridgeport, Sea Island, East Richmond and Mitchell Island and A.R.P. Brigades were assembled in each, receiving some equipment but responsible for funding and building their own fire trucks. These were assembled from purchased farm trucks or large passenger cars, stripped down to their chassis, rebuilt as needed, and fitted with gasoline powered pumps of either 150 or 500 gallons per minute mounted behind the driver’s seat. The bodies were rebuilt with mounted hose, ladder and tool carrying fittings. A rivalry ensued with the different brigades, each trying to complete their vehicle first.

The first mobile A.R.P. Unit in Canada. The Steveston Volunteers with the truck they built out of a 1925 Packard Sedan, Harry Hing at the wheel. City of Richmond Archives photograph 1978 40 13.

The first truck completed was by the Steveston group who were declared to be the first mobile A.R.P. unit in Canada. It was built with volunteer labour by Harry Hing, Jack Gollner and others at the Steveston Service Station at No.1 Road and Steveston Highway. There being no fire hall yet, the truck was kept at the service station, often with a volunteer sleeping there to be ready in case of a call. As reported in the April 15, 1942 Marpole-Richmond Review, “One watching the realistic looking fire engine streak down the road, siren shrieking, crew aboard hanging on for dear life, would never guess that this efficient looking unit had a short time ago been a 1925 Packard sedan purchased in North Vancouver for the big sum of $25.” Where no hydrant was available to supply the pump with water, the suction line could be dropped into a handy ditch or the river, providing a source for the three hoses.

The Brighouse Volunteers with their truck, a modified 1929 Buick Sedan.
City of Richmond Archives photograph 1978 40 31.

The Steveston unit was followed closely by a truck built at McClelland’s Service Station and Brighouse Motors. The Brighouse machine was constructed from a 1929 Buick Sedan and was fitted out much the same as the Steveston unit. The third fire truck built was from the Bridgeport unit, a 1935 Ford truck, outfitted like the other two vehicles.

The Bridgeport A.R.P. Volunteers pose on their fire engine, a converted 1935 Ford Truck.
City of Richmond Archives photograph 2016 16 1.
Richmond’s Air Raid Precautions volunteers pose in front of the Town Hall with their three hand-built fire trucks. On the left is the Bridgeport unit, at centre is the Brighouse truck and on the right is the Steveston truck. These three custom built vehicles responded to calls all over Richmond.
City of Richmond Archives photograph 1978 40 30.

By April 1942 there were four air raid warning sirens erected in Richmond at Steveston, Brighouse, Mitchell and at the Airport. They were all operated from a control room at 650 Burrard St. in Vancouver which sounded all fifty sirens in Vancouver and surrounding areas. Local sirens were also operable individually. A trial of the sirens on Saturday, April 25, 1942 was described in the Richmond Review under the heading “Sirens Heard In Quiet Richmond,” “The rising and falling tone did not sound unfamiliar at that, as anyone who has attended picture shows has heard the mournful wail in war pictures.” “The “imminent danger” signal came first, being five minutes of up and down intonations reaching most parts of the Island very clearly.” “The next message sent out was “raiders past,” being three minutes of steady tone.” “The sirens have one more call, the “alert,” which was not sounded Saturday but which will be five minutes of steady tone.”

The A.R.P. grew rapidly in Richmond and by the end of 1942 had around 850 members, serving in many capacities. The most active group, Steveston, had refurbished a small building next to the former Fisherman’s Hospital on No. 1 Road and set it up as a club room with donated pool tables and furniture. In Brighouse, the A.R.P. group had built a 16 by 30 foot fire hall, complete with a hose drying tower and space for a club room on the upper floor.

Harry Hing mans the pump on the Steveston A.R.P. unit’s home built fire truck. He designed and built both of Steveston’s fire trucks and its ambulance and, like most of the other volunteers, put in countless hours raising funds, fighting fires and building halls. City of Richmond Archives photograph 1984 7 5.

The District Seven (East Richmond – Mitchell) group met at the St. Thomas Hall (East Richmond Community Centre) and took specialized training in blood grouping and blood transfusion. A boy’s bicycle brigade was also formed, training schoolboys to act as dispatch riders in the event of the loss of telephone communications during an attack.

As the Second World War progressed, the A.R.P. in Richmond grew. By 1944 the Steveston group had built a modern fire hall with space for its new truck, built on a new 2-ton truck chassis by Harry Hing. He had also built an ambulance from a 1927 Lincoln car which found a home in the hall, along with the original truck which had been retired but was kept for sentimental reasons. Brighouse also had a new truck and gifted their old one to the Burkeville unit.

The newly built Steveston Firehall No.1 with the new truck, old truck and ambulance parked outside. Built by volunteer labour and lumber donated by the canneries, it and the vehicles parked outside, are an example of the capabilities of organized civilian volunteers.
City of Richmond Archives photograph 1978 40 16.
This Victory Bond ad from the April 26, 1944 Marpole-Richmond Review shows the four Richmond A.R.P. Auxiliary Fire Brigades with their vehicles.

When the Second World War ended in September 1945, the A.R.P. was disbanded and volunteers left the Brigades. The trucks were retained however and some limited volunteer fire response remained until the Steveston, Brighouse, Bridgeport and East Richmond Volunteer Fire Brigades were reorganized in 1947. The story of the A.R.P. is a testament to the effectiveness of groups of volunteers, organized in the service of their communities and the significant impact they can make. Many of the A.R.P. members went on to form the Richmond Volunteer Fire Department which formed the foundation of the present Richmond Fire-Rescue which exists today.

Notice from a September 1945 Marpole-Richmond Review announcing the disbanding of the Richmond A.R.P.

The demobilization of the A.R.P did not spell the end of Civil Defence in Richmond. With the end of the Second World War came the advent of the Atomic Age and Richmond’s response to the threat of nuclear aggression during the Cold War. Stay tuned for part two of Outside The Box – The Richmond Archives Blog’s civil defence posts.

New at the Archives – The Harada Family Records

In 2023, Jeanne Ryan (nee Harada) donated her family’s records to the City of Richmond Archives. The Harada family’s story is one that is shared by many Japanese Canadians who lived in Richmond, both before and after the forced internment of the Second World War. They have deep roots in Richmond, dating back to 1908 when Eikichi Harada emigrated from Japan.

Eikichi Harada with a sturgeon, 1930 Fraser River. City of Richmond Archives photograph 2023 13 1 26.

The family’s records consist of 2000 photographs which have been scanned from 13 photograph albums and date from around 1900 to 1977. They depict several generations of the Harada and Kamitakahara families and their relatives and friends as they moved between Japan and the British Columbia coast, internment in the B.C. interior, displacement to southern Alberta and their return to Richmond once restrictions were lifted in 1949. The albums feature themes of growing up, gatherings, weddings, celebrations and new family members.

George Kamitakahara reading, Between 1942 and 1946, Slocan City internment camp. City of Richmond Archives photograph 2023 13 1 113.

In 2024, Anouska Kirby was hired as an Archives intern. Anouska’s work involved genealogical research and consulting with Harada family members and friends to identify people, places and events and meticulously describing each of the 2000 images according to archival descriptive standards.

Harada family, between 1952 and 1957. From left to right, back row: Eikichi Harada and Eiichi Harada. Middle row: Junko (June) Ohiri, Tamae Harada and Akiko Harada. Front row: Linda Harada and Jeanne Harada. City of Richmond Archives photograph 2023 13 1 120.

The City of Richmond Archives is pleased to present an exhibit curated by Anouska and Jeanne Ryan featuring images from the Harada family photograph albums. The exhibit presents 14 carefully selected photographs grouped into four general categories: (1) Early 1900s Japanese Canadian Fishing Community; (2) Forced Displacement; (3) Rebuilding Community; and (4) New Beginnings. The exhibit can be viewed in person at the City of Richmond Archives entrance or online here.

Glen Harada, 1968 at the Harada family home on Monteith Road, Steveston. City of Richmond Archives photograph 2023 13 10 178.

The Harada family photographs are incredibly significant. Documenting multiple generations of the Harada extended family, as well as friends and workmates, these photographic records pay tribute to the strength and resilience of the Japanese Canadian community. The digitized records can be searched on the City of Richmond Archives “Search Photographs” page here.

Credits

Jeanne Ryan and Anouska Kirby. City of Richmond Archives photograph.

Physical and online exhibition curated by Anouska Kirby and Jeanne Harada.

Photograph digitization by Bev Boyd.

The work of processing and describing the Harada family photographs was made possible with gratitude to the late Geraldine (Dody) Wray and family. Dody was a long-time member and director on the board of the Friends of the Richmond Archives (FOTRA). Her generous bequest to FOTRA, along with a Young Canada Works Building Careers in Heritage grant made the project a reality.

Richmond’s Early Chinese Canadian Settlers: LAM Ching Ling and CHEW Gore

Clarence Sihoe 5 November 2025

Introduction

In late 2017, after almost fifteen years of research, I completed a book that explored the history of my mother’s family in Canada. Driven by curiosity and passion in equal measure, the work enabled all in our extended family to better understand our roots in this land and strengthen the bonds that keep us closely connected. It was satisfying to finally get the project done.

My maternal grandfather, YEE Clun, left his home village in Hoi-Ping (Kaiping) county, Kwangtung (Guangdong) province, China, and arrived in Victoria in September 1902. He paid the head tax of $100 to enter the country. Working first as a labourer, he eventually earned status as a merchant, owning and operating a number of restaurants and cafes and an import-export business in small towns and cities across Saskatchewan. This enabled him to bring my grandmother, ARNG Woon Goke, to Regina in late 1919, exempt from the head tax. There they raised a family of six children until their return to China in 1932. They reunited in Regina in 1941 and finally settled in Vancouver in the fall of 1947.

My journey to uncover these details led me down a countless number of trails: some productive, others complete dead ends. I arranged many conversations with my mother, aunts and uncle; organized a small part of our collection of family photographs; visited libraries and archives in B.C. and Saskatchewan; read dozens of articles and newspaper stories on the internet; and requested and received documents from various provincial and federal government agencies. Of great value early on were the materials held by the Vancouver Public Library Chinese Canadian Genealogy section. The records held by Library Archives Canada were also very useful, particularly the Immigrants from China database, and they continue to be an important resource for family historians and professional genealogists alike.

The year 2023 was recognized as an important date by many members of the Chinese Canadian community, for it marked the one hundredth anniversary of the passing of the Chinese Immigration Act of 1923. This federal legislation, commonly known as the Chinese Exclusion Act, more or less ended immigration of the Chinese people to Canada. There were few exceptions to this legal form of discrimination. For a quarter century until its repeal in 1947, this unjust and cruel law kept thousands of men living and working in Canada apart from their wives and children who remained in China. Some of these so called “bachelors” never reunited with their families, and they died alone in a country that may have welcomed them at first but then denied them a chance to fully participate or contribute towards the growth of this society. The Paper Trail to the 1923 Chinese Exclusion Act, an exhibit curated by Catherine Clement, explored this dark period in our history and was featured at the Chinese Canadian Museum, located in Vancouver’s Chinatown, for eighteen months that began on 1 July 2023. A digital archive of the documents displayed at the exhibition is held at UBC Library, Rare Books and Special Collections. https://rbscarchives.library.ubc.ca/paper-trail-collection

These historical facts have led me to think more about Richmond. I worked within its local government for almost three decades and I’ve resided here since 1991. My aunt, uncle, and cousins lived near the corner of No. 1 Road and Francis Road in the 1960s, but recently I began to wonder about the Chinese people who settled here over a century ago. Who was present when the Exclusion Act came into force in Richmond? The stories of the Chinese fish cannery workers and farm labourers have been documented, mostly single men who worked these seasonal jobs, and then perhaps retreated to Vancouver’s Chinatown during the wintertime. But what of the families who may have lived here? How many men and women were fortunate enough to stay together, earn a living, and raise a family on Lulu and Sea Islands? 

My research these days focuses on discovering the identities of these people, and I begin with LAM Ching Ling, proprietor of the Hong Wo Store in Steveston. His career as a general merchant, farmer, and labour contractor is well known, and has been highlighted in an informative and interesting post from May 2023, researched and written by John Campbell, Social Media Coordinator with the Friends of the Richmond Archives. https://richmondarchives.ca/2023/05/11/peace-together-ling-lam-and-the-hong-wo-store/  

To start my search, I visited the City of Richmond Archives last fall. Knowledgeable staff there pointed me towards an impressive number of municipal and community records available for consultation. These included Council minutes, voters’ lists, and directories. Most important was A Thematic Guide to the Early Records of Chinese Canadians in Richmond, prepared for the Archives by Claudia Chan in August 2011. It is an excellent summary of all the records pertaining to early Chinese Canadians held by the Archives at that time. Reading this led me to the biography files of some of the early Chinese pioneers of Richmond, LAM Ching Ling among them.

His connection to the fishing and farming industries was well documented, but more personal details about his life with family and community were scant. Using the array of genealogical resources now available, my goal is to begin adding extra layers of details to his biography, so that we may better come to know this important figure in the story of our City. I see this as the first in a series of similar stories about the other Chinese Canadian pioneer families of Richmond.

 

LAM4 Zoeng1 Ling6 (in Jyutping Cantonese romanization); LIN Zhang Ling (in Pinyin Mandarin romanization); LAM Ching Ling.

LAM Ching Ling was born on 1 August 1873 in Sun Wui county, Kwangtung (Guangdong) province, China.  Sun Wui is also known as SunWoy and as XinHui in Pinyin. The village where he is from has been written as Goo Chung, Goo Dung and Kwo Jung in various Canadian government documents.

Ling LAM (City of Richmond Archives Accession 2013 52.)

He arrived in Vancouver, B.C. in March 1890 aboard the vessel S.S. Abyssinia, and registered with the authorities on 7 March 1890. Prior to departure from Hong Kong, he had paid the $50 head tax to enter Canada.

His name was recorded in the General Register of Chinese Immigration as JUNG Ah Tuen and his entry is given the Ottawa serial number 6242, in row seventeen about two-thirds down the page.

The Register recorded various details about each individual; name, port, place and date of registration; number and date of issue of any certificates received; amount of head tax paid; sex; age; city or village, district, province of birth in China and last place of domicile; occupation; and the port and date of arrival and name of vessel on which the immigrant arrived.

LAM Ching Ling or JUNG Ah Tuen as he was then called, was listed as a “Canneryboy” and it’s notable that his height of five feet one inch was recorded and various facial markings such as moles and scars were listed under column nineteen, Physical Marks or Peculiarities. The Canadian government went to great lengths to identify and keep track of all these immigrant to the country.

General Register of Chinese Immigration page for LAM Ching Ling, serial no. 6242, http://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.redirect?app=immfrochi&id=6242&lang=eng

During his lifetime in Canada, LAM Ching Ling was known by various names. These included JUNG Ah Tuan, JUNG Ah Leun, LAM Ling, LEM Ling, CHUNG Chong, LIM Chong Ling, Hong Woo LAM and Hong Wo LAM. He is listed as LAM Duck Hew on some documents issued to his children.

He was commonly referred to as LAM Ching Lam, which may be spelled in Jyutping as LAM4 Zoeing1 Ling6. (The numbers refer to the Cantonese language tones.) The Chinese characters for this name are shown on his Chinese Immigration C.I.9 travel certificate issued in 1927, and are read from left to right.

C.I.9 travel permit issued to JUNG Ah Luen in 1927 https://heritage.canadiana.ca/view/oocihm.lac_reel_t16601/382

On his grave marker at Mountain View Cemetery in Vancouver, his name written in Chinese characters can be spelled in Jyutping as LAM4 Dak1 Diu6. This may be his name taken after marriage. LAM is the first character of the column, Dak Diu are the third and fourth. The second character, Gong, is an honorific used to respectfully refer to the deceased male.

Grave marker of LAM Ching Ling, Mountain View Cemetery, Vancouver, B.C. C.Sihoe photograph, 2025.

 ZIU6, Zhao, Chew, Chiu, Chu, Jew

CHEW Gore was born on 9 April 1875, in Sun Wui (Sun Woy, Xinhui) county, Kwangtung (Guangdong) province, China. Some documents list her birth village as Sue Kai; others list it as Kwo Jung, the same village where her husband was born.

Photograph from LAM Chew See’s C.I.44 document issued in 1924. https://recherche-collection-search.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/home/record?idnumber=254727&app=immfrochi&ecopy=t-16183-00109

She departed from Hong Kong aboard the vessel Empress of Japan and arrived at Vancouver in June 1899.  She was registered under her birth name JEW Gow.

General Register of Chinese Immigration page for JEW Gow, serial no. 30707. http://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.redirect?app=immfrochi&id=30712&lang=eng

She had travelled to Canada with her husband, LAM Ching Ling, recorded this time in the General Register as LEM Ling, and their seven months old daughter, LEM Kim Fon. LAM Ching Ling had returned to China sometime in the late 1890s.

He was now classified as a merchant and head tax payments for himself and daughter LEM Kim Gon were later refunded. It would be expected that JEW Gow, being a merchant’s wife, would have been exempted from the head tax payment as well, but she was classified as a housewife upon entry and pays the $50 fee.

After marriage JEW Gow would often be referred to as LAM Chew Shee, meaning “a woman born of the CHEW clan and married to a LAM”. 

LAM Ching Ling and LAM Chew Shee had six children:

The eldest child and first daughter was Kim Fon, also known as Fanny. She was born in 1898, in China. She died in 1918.

The next five children were all born in Canada. Names are shown in English, Jyutping, and Pinyin romanization.

Mary (LAM4 Ping4 Ngoi3, LIN Pingxi) born, 31 October 1900, died 1990;

George (LAM4 Fuk1 Tin4, LIN Futian) born, 20 March 1904, died 1970;

John (LAM4 Fuk1 Coeng4, LIN Fuxiang) born in 1908, died 1922;

Jessie born on 24 October 1910, died in 1995; and

Dorathea (LAM4 Cai4 Mei5, LIN Qimei, ) born on 9 September 1916, died in 1947.

Mary LAM was born in Steveston. A doctor was present at her birth. LAM Duck Heu is named as her father and it is recorded that she is the second child born to CHEW Shee. Their address is given as 1452 East 11th Avenue in Vancouver.

Birth Registration certificate for Mary LAM. https://search-collections.royalbcmuseum.bc.ca/Image/Genealogy/f722893d-be21-43ab-bfc8-3248a82fad44 

An entry for the LAM Ching Ling family has been recorded in each Census of Canada for the years 1901, 1911, 1921, and 1931. (The microfilm records of these documents are often of poor quality, making the deciphering of the census taker’s handwriting difficult. Sometimes the handwriting itself is almost illegible. The names given are taken from the Ancestry.ca website, and often represent their researcher’s “best guess”.)

In the 1901 Census of Canada, LAM Ching Ling is listed as LING Lim, 28, living and working in Richmond, B.C. as a General Merchant. Named, as well, are his wife, Gem Ling, 26, and two daughters: Com Fung Lung, 2, and Ping Wye Ling, 1., lines 39-42. http://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.redirect?app=census&id=33558608&lang=eng

In the 1911 Census of Canada, he is listed as HONGWO, Isac, 37, and residing at 9 Broadway E. in Vancouver. His family includes wife Laren, 35, and five children: daughters Mung, 12, Mary, 10, and Bessie, 8 months; and sons George, 7, and Charot, 2., lines 22-28.  http://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.redirect?app=census&id=6818361&lang=eng 

Entry for the LAM Family in the 1911 Census of Canada.

In the 1921 Census of Canada, he is listed LING Lenn, 48, and residing at 605 Broadway E. in Vancouver. His spouse is Chee Ling, 46, and their five children are George, 17, John 13, Mary, 20, Jessie, 10, and Dora, 5., lines 44-50.  http://central.baclac.gc.ca/.redirect?app=census&id=66466013&lang=eng 

In the 1931 Census of Canada, he is listed as LAM Hongwo, 57, and living at 1452 East 11th Avenue in Vancouver. He is classified as a merchant working in a general store. Family members include wife Stell, 55, and four children: Mary, 28, Jessie, 20, George, 26, and Dora, 15., lines 42-47.  http://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.redirect?app=census&id=85837223&lang=eng  

On 28 June 1924, in Vancouver, LAM Ching Ling, and his family, registered as per Section 18 of the Chinese Immigration (Exclusion) Act of 1923. Every person of Chinese descent or origin (i.e. immigrant or native-born) was required to register his or her presence with a government official. These were often local police officers or postmasters.  LAM Ching Ling was issued C.I.44 certificate number 52656. Note that he is referred to as CHUNG Chong.

http://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.redirect?app=immfrochi&id=254954&lang=eng 

On this document, his family is listed as: wife LIM Chew Shee, 1 son LIM Fook Ten (George), 3 daughters LIM Ping Oy (Mary), LIM Chu Yen (Jessie), and LIM Tie Mee (Dora).  Daughter Fanny (Kim Fon) had passed away in 1918, and second son John in 1922.

http://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.redirect?app=immfrochi&id=254727&lang=eng 

http://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.redirect?app=immfrochi&id=254662&lang=eng 

http://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.redirect?app=immfrochi&id=254664&lang=eng

http://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.redirect?app=immfrochi&id=254658&lang=eng

http://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.redirect?app=immfrochi&id=254660&lang=eng

The Canadian government implemented an expansive system of paperwork to record, track, monitor and control the movements of the Chinese people travelling to, from and within Canada. Upon arrival and after registration, a new immigrant would receive their head tax certificate, known as the C.I.5 or C.I.30 if exempted from payment, which served as the primary means of identification. If lost or destroyed, a C.I.28 was issued as a replacement.

JEW Gow’s C.I.5 certificate is replaced by C.I.28 certificate no. 12219, on 1 December 1924, although it had been endorsed as early as 28 June 1924. 

Page from the C.I.28 Register for JEW Gow, no. 12219. https://heritage.canadiana.ca/view/oocihm.lac_reel_t3486/710

On 13 June 1925, LAM Ching Ling’s C.I.5 certificate, is either lost or damaged, and is replaced by C.I.28 certificate no. 12350.

Page from the C.I. 28 Register for LAM Ching Ling, no. 12350. https://heritage.canadiana.ca/view/oocihm.lac_reel_t3486/711

During this time, any Chinese person wishing to leave Canada temporarily had to apply for a special travel document known as a C.I.9 certificate. On 7 July 1927, the LAM family received theirs for an intended trip to Seattle, Washington by CPR Local rail. On LAM Ching Ling’s C.I.9 no. 59670, his proper name is given as JUNG Ah Luen. https://heritage.canadiana.ca/view/oocihm.lac_reel_t16601/382

Note the lack of a signature on CHEW Gore’s document. https://heritage.canadiana.ca/view/oocihm.lac_reel_t16601/383

In the 1931 Census of Canada, LAM Ching Ling and his family are listed at 1452 East 11th Avenue, District 235 Vancouver Burrard, sub-district no. 52, Vancouver City, p.9. He is named as LAM Hongwo. Occupations are listed for each family member: LAM Hong Wo – merchant; his wife Shee – homemaker; Mary – teacher; Jessie – stenographer; George – laborer; and Dora – student.

LAM Ching Lam died on 20 August 1939. His obituary appeared in the Vancouver Daily Province, 21 August 1939. page 13.

The funeral procession was noted in the Vancouver Sun, 24 August 1939, page 12.

Services for LAM Ching Ling were described in the Vancouver Daily Province, 24 August 1939, page 24. Note the mention of a brother living in Steveston.

LAM Ching Ling is interred at Mountain View Cemetery in Vancouver and is recorded as CHUNG Ling Lam in its database. https://covapp.vancouver.ca/BurialIndex/PersonDetail.aspx?PersonId=d1c14bed-1f6c-420e-a290-2c63fbdcbc7e

LAM Chew Shee died on 20 February 1947.  Place of burial is Mountain View Cemetery, Vancouver, B.C. Her obituary appeared in the Vancouver Daily Province, 22 February 1947.

Most members of the LAM family are interred or commemorated at Mountain View Cemetery, in Vancouver, B.C. Photographs were taken on 22 March 2025.

Translation of the Chinese characters is approximately as follows. 

On the left side, four characters: Woman of the CHEW clan who entered the LAM household.

On the left side column: The grave of Mrs. LAM Dak Diu.

On the right side column: The grave of Mr. LAM Dak Diu

Frank Shong is the husband of Mary Mah.

Conclusion

The City of Richmond Archives has a significant number of records from the Hong Wo Store. These records, currently being cleaned by a conservator, will be accessible to researchers, possibly by the end of 2025. A preliminary review of some of these documents, as well as others, leads me to believe that LAM Ching Ling’s brother was involved in the store’s operation. That idea, the achievements of some of the children of LAM Ching Ling and CHEW Gore, and the stories of Richmond’s other pioneer Chinese Canadian families, will all be the subjects of posts in the future.